But now all the sudden she’s fine with going to prison?
Like I said, I don’t believe the jury is going to buy her amnesia act. Especially after she testified in court about Tory “mentioning 1 million dollars”, “about the case”. Now all the sudden she doesn’t remember. And then she never even says Tory didn’t shoot, she’s just saying that she didn’t see it, she just heard the shots which doesn’t rule him out.
At this point, every single eye witness has Tory as the shooter. Tory is the only one claiming he didn’t shoot and who knows if he’ll even take the stand.
Did the defense in court ever say this?
Plus at best the witness still doesn't singularly point to a single shooter AND the witness confirmed Kelsey is potentially at fault for firing the weapon at some point.
This is what you keep ignoring.
That's cool, but all these other stories are conflicting with hers. The victim was also intoxicated so she's already not the most reliable witness.Cause the biggest piece of evidence is that the victim identified the shooter.
It’s not like she didn’t know him and picked him out of a lineup or that he has some type of alibi.
All of this has been to explain away the one person who would have the clearest picture of who shot who
not WHEN the gun was fired.So, defend witness confirms that Tory Lanez had a gun in hand. And that he fired.
Wow.
She doesn't have to go to prison, unless they go after her for perjury. There is nothing except perjury she can be charged with now with immunity.
Perjury is probably 1/2 years. It beats 22 years.
Megan could also be charged for perjury. She lied about the physical altercation.
This witness definitely doesn't put her in a favorable light.
You are forgetting, or purposely omitting, Kelsey is also a shooter, and probably the shooter that caused Meg's injury.
Kelsey's and Meg's testimonies have lies. I think that has been established by
You’re omitting the the witness said Kelsey shot INTO the car, not at Meg, the fact that there were no bullets shot into the car, calls that whole testimony into question.She doesn't have to go to prison, unless they go after her for perjury. There is nothing except perjury she can be charged with now with immunity.
Perjury is probably 1/2 years. It beats 22 years.
Megan could also be charged for perjury. She lied about the physical altercation.
This witness definitely doesn't put her in a favorable light.
You are forgetting, or purposely omitting, Kelsey is also a shooter, and probably the shooter that caused Meg's injury.
Kelsey's and Meg's testimonies have lies. I think that has been established by now.
Defense.Is this the defense witness or Prosecution?
Is this the defense witness or Prosecution?
That's cool, but all these other stories are conflicting with hers. The victim was also intoxicated so she's already not the most reliable witness.
The point is, none of this is clean cut case. It's messy. If I'm the jury, how do I vote to convict after hearing all this conflicting testimony? Simple answer, I don't.
not WHEN the gun was fired.
Most shootings are convicted without a victim IDing the shooter. Let alone the other physical evidence in this case.If all a jury ever needed was a victim to ID an assailant, all court cases would last less than a single day and prosecutors wouldn't bother calling up other witnesses.
You have to put yourselves in the shoes of a juror who knows fukk all about the situation except what you've heard in court. Which is a bunch of different stories and subpar detective work.
This is nowhere near a slam dunk for the prosecution. I've sat in on around 10 court cases back in college and this one sounds like a complete clusterfukk as far as evidence and witnesses go. I'd be extremely surprised if an LA county jury can come to a unanimous decision on this.