The official ‘Tory Lanez vs Megan Thee Stallion’ trial thread.

[Turbulent]

You’re omitting the the witness said Kelsey shot INTO the car, not at Meg, the fact that there were no bullets shot into the car, calls that whole testimony into question.

I think they said towards the car, not into the car.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

You’re wrong. He already said he saw Tory let off shots.

Wrong again.

FIRST shots went off with the woman is what the witness said.

Of course tory touched the gun either to empty the clip to discharge remaining rounds during a struggle OR to recover the weapon.

 

[MeachTheMonster]

That's cool, but all these other stories are conflicting with hers. The victim was also intoxicated so she's already not the most reliable witness.

The point is, none of this is clean cut case. It's messy. If I'm the jury, how do I vote to convict after hearing all this conflicting testimony? Simple answer, I don't.

Not really. The other person in the car corroborated her story to a T. And the only other person to tell a story couldn’t even corroborate himself

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

This is a weird ass case.

Only because the victim lied or was too drunk to remember what happened

 

[iamduval]

Kelsey and Meg fighting was more like a beat down. Meg is legit 6ft and built in a drunken rage. That must have been horrific. No wonder kelsey grabbed the gun

 

[cauliflower]

Did the defense ever say what?

What you’re ignoring is that the witness says the woman fired the weapon into the truck, as for the other four to five shots he gave those to Tory(described as the short guy).

And after those 4-5 shots, he said seen a woman crawling across to a nearby driveway. There were only 5 shell casings found on scene, and 5 shots heard (on a ring camera) consistently. Nothing on the vehicle or in the vehicle was damaged either.

 

[jay83]

Only because the victim lied or was too drunk to remember what happened

Probably both. Lol.

 

[Thingsfallapart]

not WHEN the gun was fired.

No. He said she was shooting “into the car”.

 

[Keep_It_Hip_Hop_Fam]

You’re omitting the the witness said Kelsey shot INTO the car, not at Meg, the fact that there were no bullets shot into the car, calls that whole testimony into question.

And when did this witness say Tory shot AT Meg?

Who went for the gun? Tory or Meg? What was Meg's intention when she retrieved that weapon from the vehicle?

 

[Sad Bunny]

Wrong again.

FIRST shots went off with the woman is what the witness said.

Of course tory touched the gun either to empty the clip to discharge remaining rounds during a struggle OR to recover the weapon.

 

[The Wolf Among You]

Wrong again.

FIRST shots went off with the woman is what the witness said.

Of course tory touched the gun either to empty the clip to discharge remaining rounds during a struggle OR to recover the weapon.

Breh, you are literally lying right now.
The witness you are quoting for the woman letting off the first shot, is the same witness that is saying Tory let of four to five shots like a mad man.

What the fukk is going on in this thread?!

 

[KingTut]

Most shootings are convicted without a victim IDing the shooter. Let alone the other physical evidence in this case.

You got a victim IDing the shooter. The shooter on the scene, other physical evidence to the fact that the shooter possessed and fired a gun.

Aight bro, you got it

 

[Tha_Mac]

I know dudes wanna ride for Tory on the shooting, but I know damn well y'all ain't condoning him putting hands on and beating up two females?

 

[MeachTheMonster]

Breh, you are literally lying right now.
The witness you are quoting for the woman letting off the first shot, is the same witness that is saying Tory let of four to five shots like a mad man.

What the fukk is going on in this thread?!

Cognitive dissonance: The thread

 

[iamduval]

4-5 shots and their were only 5 rounds in the gun. Kelsey apparently shot into the car. So the door was open.

Tory and his security proceed to beat the shyt out of Kelsey