Saysumthinfunnymike
VOTE!!!
I dont think they can.
judge said the jury cannot use that interview as evidence
I dont think they can.
FYI, it isn't Tory Lanez vs Megan Thee Stallion. She's not the one pressing charges. Had it been up to her, Tory wouldn't be on trial and none of us would ever have heard about this. This is the State's doing.
So if Tory is found guilty, it won’t be Megan's fault. This is all because of the state.
this is a megan case just as it's a state case don't be obtuse, this is also the world championship of city boy vs girl as well, everything is on the line!Ok? She didn't press the charges. The state did. That was the point I was making. So the thread title is incorrect.
oh you are another bytch.... Carry on.
Sure. Tory had GSR all on his hands too
And there's more circumstantial evidence that points to Tory being the shooter
Tory sent out apology text ...
Kelsey text, regardless of her testimony, are very incriminating. Text were sent out shortly after the shooting. Within minutes I believe. Objectively speaking that greatly reduces the likelihood that she was inaccurately remembering the event months or years later... and greatly reduces the likelihood they were a part of some grand scheme she had to frame Tory
Before you start, to deduce or assume "Tory shot Meg", I would argue she would have to of heard gun shots. She admitted that. She also must of seen Tory with a gun
In addition Tory has a history of violence and police run ins
I was questioning if that was the witness, because I thought there were two. Regarding the shooting the 'sean kelly' witness will not testify and won't share what he saw because every single one of his statements contradicted each other. He said he seen 2 women fighting, then he said he seen 2 men beating one woman and then he seen all 3 people beating 1 woman. He also said he seen the muzzle flash closer near kelsey, then he said he seen the muzzle flashes but could not determine where they came from.Say word?
Link us.
No, they can't consider it as evidence. It now amounts to inadmissible hearsay. I don't watch Law and Order, and you really shouldn't be using a TV show to form an understanding of why things are done.so for semantic purposes, she admitted verbally that she previously sent a text claiming help, tory shot meg, 911..... the jury can consider her testimony regarding the prior text lol (even if they dont see a print out)
and just for more practical purposes, stuff like that (the fact that there is a text message even if they can't see it) isn't lost upon juries. why do you think during shows like law and order when they show the trial, an attorney will ask a question that they know is objectionable, even if they have to withdraw the question. they do it just so they can give a hint to the jury, because juries hear about things and act on them regardless of what the judge says
Shawty has a diss track about shooting MEg
We don't know exactly what Tory was apology for
Cory was supposed to in her placeKylie was never showing up to this dumb shyt.
That’s true, I wonder what changed. I’d assume after Kelsey he wasn’t interested.Cory was supposed to in her place
Rocnation probably threatened them to be honest, if you notice they’ve been leaking these conspiracy theories to the press everytime they feel like they’re losing the case to blogs and reporters like the Shaderoom, Nancy Dilion and that other ugly white reporter.That’s true, I wonder what changed. I’d assume after Kelsey he wasn’t interested.