So when are wrapping this shyt up? No more testimonies?
Still gotta hear from the witness and the Meg's surgeon and I think Cory Gamble from the Kardashians camp if they call him.
So when are wrapping this shyt up? No more testimonies?
Shawn Holley was his lawyer last year? Wonder why Tory changed lawyers before the trial
you're so shameless. The part you're trying to run with has LESS information.No, i posted the direct quotes of what was said. The one Yahoo article got it wrong they weren’t asking her about the tape. They directly asked her if he threatened her. She replied Yes.
“Do you remember in this interview with (another prosecutor) and myself, that you mentioned he threatened to shoot you?” Ta asked.
“Do I have to answer that?” Harris said, looking at the judge.
“Yes,” Judge David Herriford said.
“Um, yes, ma’am,” Harris replied, confirming she made the claim Peterson threatened to shoot her.
it says thats for a different case and it was a different lawyer that withdrew‘Irreconcilable Differences': Tory Lanez’ Lawyer Drops Troubled Rapper In Battle With ‘Love & Hip Hop’ Star Over Alleged Nightclub Assault
The pint-sized rapper is accused of of attacking him at a Miami nightclub in 2019 and then instructing his employee to assault him inside a club a year after the first incident.radaronline.com
I actually used to cover court cases as a newspaper reporter. The fukkery of this case got me Jonesing to pick that reporter notepad back up
you're so shameless
so now you're saying that the Yahoo article that YOU posted to corroborate your claims made this whole passage up:
^keep in mind that those are DIRECT quotes. Not presumptions. It's a direct quote. You're saying Yahoo made that up? You're saying that the very same source you tried to use as legitimate and to question AK and No Jumper - is making up DIRECT quotes now? And that we should trust YOU to select which passages are true and how they came about?
Yahoo article 1 said:Deputy District Attorney Kathy Ta then asked Harris if Lanez had threatened her with a gun during the three-way argument. Harris, who sought to avoid answering the question, eventually confirmed that Lanez did threaten her.”
Harris immunity meant she couldn’t plead the Fifth, but she asked to do so when Ta asked if Lanez had threatened to shoot her.
Do I have to answer that?” Harris asked.
“Yes,” Ta answered.
Harris did so by saying, “Yes, ma’am,” affirming that Lanez threatened to shoot her.
Yahoo article 2 said:Do you remember in this interview with (another prosecutor) and myself, that you mentioned he threatened to shoot you?” Ta asked.
“Do I have to answer that?” Harris said, looking at the judge.
“Yes,” Judge David Herriford said.
“Um, yes, ma’am,” Harris replied, confirming she made the claim Peterson threatened to shoot her.
5 different reports, framing things as they see fit.
All i said from jump was depending on where you get your info from it’s gonna be framed from someone else’s perspective. Sometimes with an agenda behind it.
“Do you remember in this interview with (another prosecutor) and myself, that you mentioned he threatened to shoot you?” Ta asked.
“Do I have to answer that?” Harris said, looking at the judge.
“Yes,” Judge David Herriford said.
“Um, yes, ma’am,” Harris replied, confirming she made the claim Peterson threatened to shoot her.