MarxismToday
Really good introduction to Marxism, especially the initial sub-topic explanation videos
Really good introduction to Marxism, especially the initial sub-topic explanation videos
USSR wasn't a bad place to be post Stalin, in the grand scheme atleast.
Love getting lectured on soviet history from people who have never read a primary source
In the grand scheme guys, I'm not saying the USSR had a higher standard of living than the us. People weren't falling out in the street tho. Soviet nostalgia has a lot to do with nationalism but there's a real material basis for this phenomena
You don't even know the fukking cyrillic alphabet.
Get THE fukk outta here bro talking about "primary sources"
I GUARANTEE you, I know more about the Cold War than you will ever wish you did so don't pretend to be an expert on this bullshyt. Stick to your little bullshyt undergrad schedule before your card gets pulled any further.
Sorry breh but you're completely off base. I was born in Moscow and my family has gone through Lenin, Stalin, and the rest of the Communists. Russia in no way, shape, or form "wasn't a bad place to be". The government held all of the power and was corrupt. The general public lived well below the means of the country. Every single Russian I talk to now, loves that the country went capitalist. There's no such thing as the glory days for the common person in post-Stalin Russia.
Considering you apparently think translating documents makes them secondary sources I'm doubting youre that historically literate
I'm not saying the Soviet Union was a glorious place to live post-Stalin, just that there was a decent standard of living relative to most of the world. Especially considering the abject backwards nature of Russian history and the absolute devastation of the Nazi invasion. There's a material basis for Soviet nostalgia, it wasn't just breadlines and such.
Sorry breh but you're completely off base. I was born in Moscow and my family has gone through Lenin, Stalin, and the rest of the Communists. Russia in no way, shape, or form "wasn't a bad place to be". The government held all of the power and was corrupt. The general public lived well below the means of the country. Every single Russian I talk to now, loves that the country went capitalist. There's no such thing as the glory days for the common person in post-Stalin Russia.
I would imagine that Western Propaganda had a hand in this as well
You see that more on the western end. American Millennials love socialism and communism compared to gen Xers and boomers who are not big fans
You say that the Soviet Union wasn't a glorious place to live but wasn't THAT bad. I guess my question is if you had to pick between the form of government in western countries vs the one that existed in the Soviet Union, which would you pick?Considering you apparently think translating documents makes them secondary sources I'm doubting youre that historically literate
I'm not saying the Soviet Union was a glorious place to live post-Stalin, just that there was a decent standard of living relative to most of the world. Especially considering the abject backwards nature of Russian history and the absolute devastation of the Nazi invasion. There's a material basis for Soviet nostalgia, it wasn't just breadlines and such.
You say that the Soviet Union wasn't a glorious place to live but wasn't THAT bad. I guess my question is if you had to pick between the form of government in western countries vs the one that existed in the Soviet Union, which would you pick?
You mention the devastation after WW2, but lets take a look at countries that suffered heavily after WW2. Britian, China, Japan, USSR, and Germany. Japan, Britain and West Germany and West Berlin took on more western style forms of democracy while China, East Germany, and East Berlin took on another. I think most agree that the Japanese, Britain, and Western German societies recovered faster and had higher quality of life. In relative terms it makes these communist influenced governments appear inferior and leads to a lower quality of life.
So...why support it and be an apologist for it?
Never thought I'd post something from The American Conservative in here but this is a pretty nice article on class ID What Middle Class?
Sennett and Cobb discovered that the most marginal of America’s working class would rather be perceived as “middle class” than revolt and overthrow the rule of capital altogether—or even make more money.