Nephilim_BC
Murikkka
Didnt know that was their next movie. Thought it came out already?They didn't do it for Future Past
Didnt know that was their next movie. Thought it came out already?They didn't do it for Future Past
Whenever fanboys get attacked they always post blanket statements like this dumb shyt here. I have no problem with marvel, just their fanboys.Marvel must have killed someone in ya fam breh..you getting creepy
this right here
I loved the movie, but its not seeing SW at all. way too early to even have that convo.
like someone said earlier GoTG is more comparable to Flash Gordon from the 80's than SW
Again, it wasn't shown or explained WHY. It was brushed off and poorly executed. Why you think the MAJORITY of people stating the weakest link of the film is the villain. He came off as some cliche evil antagonist. A blank face. Very generic. No personality. NOTHING. As well as they developed the characters of the Guardians, they didn't do so much with Ronan the Accuser, especially nothing like he is in the comics.
And don't throw that "fanboy" shiit either, because Yondu in the comics was nothing like in the film either, but he was handled WELL. But Ronan was generic as the REST of the Marvel villains before him.
it was a quality children's movie, which I see now is marvel's agenda as oppose to WB/DC trying to make movies for adults, which is probably why their winning, stuff like that dikk line should have been left out in child's movie in my opinion
the comedy I didn't care for, it looked good visually but not was too cartoony, even though thats problem how it was intended
the air battle looked like some shyt outta of Final Fantasy, I mean it looked good, but it was too videogamish
All movies with marvel characters are marvel movies. nikkas trying to only say marvel studios acting like the others are trash. Marvel sold some rights to other studios to make movies...but those are still marvel movies. Cause if they arent then i guess these are all disney movies now right?
You must be referring to the animated movies because DC's live action movies don't do anywhere near as good as any of the Marvel movies be it Marvel studios, Fox, Or Sony, with the exception of Batman. The only place DC is winning is in the animated universe.
So marvel comics with different writers are only marvel if its a good writer or what?Uh....no, they aren't Marvel movies actually.
And yes, in the court of public opinion a movie that Marvel Studios had nothing to do with does reflect negatively/positively on the company. Of course it does, it's their characters. But the people on this forum are fairly well versed in movies, and pop culture in general, so we know better, don't we?
That's like saying "Hellraiser 7" is a Clive Barker movie because he sold them the rights back in 1986, and it's his fault the franchise sucks because he sold it to them, despite the fact he's had zero input since 1988. shyt makes zero sense, which is why multiple people are responding to your posts on some shyt.
I mean....c'mon son. Your only rebuttal is "they're all fanboys" which is because I've never seen any of these dudes discuss Marvel outside of this thread. This isn't a very comic-centric forum, nor was The Arcadium prior to this, or The Rec Room prior to that. These people are just random ass people that liked the movie, that you're trying to put the "fanboy" jacket on because they're disagreeing with you.
Fred.
And comics currently. Marvel has live action movies and video games on lockYou must be referring to the animated movies because DC's live action movies don't do anywhere near as good as any of the Marvel movies be it Marvel studios, Fox, Or Sony, with the exception of Batman. The only place DC is winning is in the animated universe.