- The US is going to change its stance on responding to terror attacks
Irrelevant, we're talking about withdrawing of military funding. You your self argued they aren't just a vassal state to the US, so clearly our "stance" isn't only contingent on military aid.
- Withdraw funding from Israel which will ultimately lead to larger conflict and humanitarian crisis (ww3?)
I thought we weren't doing thought experiments? WW3?
- Pretend Netanyahu actually survives not attacking hamas
Have you seen his recent poll numbers, it doesn't look like he's going to survive attacking Hamas.
- That he wouldn’t just be replaced by someone who would
Can't argue with that.
- The Hamas attack was somehow justified
It was not but neither was the response to said attack.
- That the US is actually going to make a bluff that weakens their foothold in the ME
You're acting as if we didn't just spend 2 decades building military infrastructure in Iraq and Kuwait. Israel's - read Mossad - ability to infiltrate extremist organizations is strategically advantageous but the war on terror if nothing else strengthened our strategic posture in the ME without the need to rely on others.
- That it would be political suicide and just as morally reprehensible to abandon Israel and leave them to the whim of Iran
Again, you're talking about abandoning them as if our only use to them is our military aid. Are you now saying they're a vassal state?
I operate in the real world where this just isn’t part of daily conversation.
I also recognize that US media is very much an on to the next one to keep engagement up in our 24/7 news cycle.
And you also know that this is just the sort of hot take corporate media content they can ride through a typically slow holiday cycle. Come on my G.