Why? You keep claiming they’re all inadequate deals.
Ok. We see how not taking those deals turned out.
They were never given an option to take that deal, and you know that. Stop lying.
1) You started out this line of conversation claiming that no one had pushed for Palestinian soverignity in the 1960s, despite admitting that you didn't even know if that was true and were basically making it up off of random hearsay.
2) When I challenged you to substantiate that bullshyt, you deflected and said the Palestinians should have taken one of the deals Israel offered.
3) When I challenged you to actually describe the offer they should have taken, you gave the Clinton Parameters, a third-party idea that Israel NEVER put on the table, and which Palestine was perfectly willing to keep working from but Israel broke off negoiations and never came back to the table.
4) Challenged again to actually answer #3, you circled back to #2 and are just vaguely accusing them of "not taking deals" again, still without being able to tell me what deal Isarel actually ever offered them that they should have taken.