If you have precedent I'd like to see it. But I don't see that as a DSQ by any means.For a brake test? It falls into that category. There is also a stop and go or grid drop. It certainly isn't a ten second penalty.
If you have precedent I'd like to see it. But I don't see that as a DSQ by any means.For a brake test? It falls into that category. There is also a stop and go or grid drop. It certainly isn't a ten second penalty.
I mean I'm not black, not gonna act like I am but these dudes cape so much for Max and even when FIA rules and the evidence is in front of them, max is always the victim.Their white fans against a Black athlete. Just in my experience, those are always the WOAT fans
No one is getting a DSQ for that.
I'm not a Max fan. Far from it. I'm being objective. Yall over here doing the same bullshyt psychoanalysis people were doing after Lewis at Silverstone. It's silly.
Most fans don't give two shyts how they go about it if the driver is a winner. You can say Max is an aggressive driver that's borderline dirty, but to say people shouldn't support him because of his driving style? Get real.![]()
Go back in this thread and read if I was defending Max at Silverstone. I wasn't. I thought Lewis was well within his right to place his car where he did.Max was only in first at Silverstone because he took position off track. Then he was weaving to keep Lewis from retaking the lead. Then he cut across the front of Lewis' car intentionally at Copse. His onboard literally shows him look in his mirror-- see Lewis and then turn abruptly. Lewis on the other hand braked early at Copse to AVOID the collision. It's on video. And we can ban bet on that friend. The audacity to compare that to today when he intentionally brake tested and drove erratically to create that whole situation-- and to top it off we have audio of his TP telling him to be "strategic".
Defending a driver who literally caused three different incidents that could have caused collisions and succeeding the third time.![]()
Heās the biggest sports celebrity in the Netherlands . Of course he has insane fans .Max fans are the most insufferable fukks and I whole handedly believe a majority of them are 16 years old.
A brake check isn't seen as a heat of the moment racing incident. It's a safety issue. Brake testing at high speeds can get you hurt or killed. That's why these claims are taken seriously. Safety issues. For example, Vettel claimed Hamilton brake tested him and deliberately banged wheels with Hamilton. He got a stop and go for that. Brake testing is just as serious as what Vettel did.If you have precedent I'd like to see it. But I don't see that as a DSQ by any means.
Great man. I understand that. My issue was with you saying he should be DSQ'd. Nothing about him not being penalized.A brake check isn't seen as a heat of the moment racing incident. It's a safety issue. Brake testing at high speeds can get you hurt or killed. That's why these claims are taken seriously. Safety issues. For example, Vettel claimed Hamilton brake tested him and deliberately banged wheels with Hamilton. He got a stop and go for that. Brake testing is just as serious as what Vettel did.
he was angry Lewis hadn't driven past him, then stood on the brakes. I'm.not sure Hamilton will be able to overtake this kid in Abu Dhabi without Max causing a collision. Lewis will have to get pole and stay in front.![]()
69 bar and 2.4 G of deceleration...
yet they try to swear max didn't brake test.
Itās the only way. Max has more victories so itās in his best interest to be an agent of chaosā¦and destroy every damn thinghe was angry Lewis hadn't driven past him, then stood on the brakes. I'm.not sure Hamilton will be able to overtake this kid in Abu Dhabi without Max causing a collision. Lewis will have to get pole and stay in front.
I like
![]()