The Official FIFA World Cup Thread - QATAR 2022

WHO WILL WIN?


  • Total voters
    144
  • Poll closed .

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
50,906
Reputation
19,616
Daps
202,579
Reppin
the ether
they got the easiest group by far


"Group B has been widely described as the "group of death" for the tournament. It had the highest average FIFA ranking of any group,"

"According to FIFA rankings, which are admittedly controversial and unreliable, Group B emerges as a surprise Group of Death. It features England (5th ranked), Iran (21st), USA (15th), and the winner of Europe’s playoff. Wales is the highest-ranked of those teams at 18th in the world – meaning the group would have an average ranking of 14.75 if Wales qualify."

"Wales, England and Iran are the three opponents, and while it seems manageable on paper, it also arguably makes for the most difficult quartet in the competition."


Just :troll: though, this is why I said earlier that FIFA rankings are meaningless.

Belgium #2 in the world coming in. Wales and Iran supposedly tough opponents at #18 and #21 while and Algeria #37 and Ghana #61.
 

Wudo75

Rookie
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
181
Reputation
5
Daps
207
Reppin
NULL
Germany has created by far the most great goal-scoring chances of all the participants in this World Cup. Germany managed to pull off an incredible number of fantastic attacking moves that probably no more than four or five other teams have managed at this World Cup. Germany deserved to be eliminated in the preliminary round.

After losing the ball, Germany often had no order in midfield and defense. Germany very seldom succeeded in establishing a secure passing game in defense and midfield that served its own recovery, to draw out the opponent and to break the rhythm. Thus, it looked like an immensely talented team that played without rest and was immediately startled by simple attacks from the opponent.

This is not surprising, considering the fact that the team had already blown a number of victories the year before the World Cup.

But: We trust in Flick. It's his style of play leading bayern to sextruple. he only needs some time.
 

Liu Kang

KING KILLAYAN MBRRRAPPÉ
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
13,538
Reputation
5,455
Daps
29,272
Germany has created by far the most great goal-scoring chances of all the participants in this World Cup. Germany managed to pull off an incredible number of fantastic attacking moves that probably no more than four or five other teams have managed at this World Cup. Germany deserved to be eliminated in the preliminary round.

After losing the ball, Germany often had no order in midfield and defense. Germany very seldom succeeded in establishing a secure passing game in defense and midfield that served its own recovery, to draw out the opponent and to break the rhythm. Thus, it looked like an immensely talented team that played without rest and was immediately startled by simple attacks from the opponent.

This is not surprising, considering the fact that the team had already blown a number of victories the year before the World Cup.

But: We trust in Flick. It's his style of play leading bayern to sextruple. he only needs some time.
This WC does show that the cycle has come back to having the need of a proper 9. Not necessarily a Inzaghi type but one that is an actual goal threat in order to convert chances.

The issue with Germany was that they did create many chances but those were not "big chances" most of the time. So if you do not have somebody that can convert those small chances, you're not scoring.

The match against Japan is good evidence of that. The biggest chance is the pen (that was scored) but otherwise, it's plenty of low percentage shots.



So, that many chances creates a false sense of domination. On a given day, a team that only has a couple of big chances can win against one than have 20 small ones even though the xG battle will be lost at the end.

That style of play Germany does is better suited for leagues where things evens out during a season. That's why teams like Pep's City fare extremely well in leagues but can crash out early in tournaments. It only takes one bad game there.
 

concise

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
38,889
Reputation
3,365
Daps
94,335
"Group B has been widely described as the "group of death" for the tournament. It had the highest average FIFA ranking of any group,"

"According to FIFA rankings, which are admittedly controversial and unreliable, Group B emerges as a surprise Group of Death. It features England (5th ranked), Iran (21st), USA (15th), and the winner of Europe’s playoff. Wales is the highest-ranked of those teams at 18th in the world – meaning the group would have an average ranking of 14.75 if Wales qualify."

"Wales, England and Iran are the three opponents, and while it seems manageable on paper, it also arguably makes for the most difficult quartet in the competition."


Just :troll: though, this is why I said earlier that FIFA rankings are meaningless.

Belgium #2 in the world coming in. Wales and Iran supposedly tough opponents at #18 and #21 while and Algeria #37 and Ghana #61.


I mean, if it wasn't for the Russian invasion of Ukraine pushing their playoffs back, Wales would have qualified in time to be a known team and placed into their proper pot like Portugal and Poland did.
Wales would have been in the same pot as Iran and Group B would have been impossible to exist.
 

Harry B

Superstar
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
29,829
Reputation
-1,509
Daps
59,592
This WC does show that the cycle has come back to having the need of a proper 9. Not necessarily a Inzaghi type but one that is an actual goal threat in order to convert chances.

The issue with Germany was that they did create many chances but those were not "big chances" most of the time. So if you do not have somebody that can convert those small chances, you're not scoring.

The match against Japan is good evidence of that. The biggest chance is the pen (that was scored) but otherwise, it's plenty of low percentage shots.



So, that many chances creates a false sense of domination. On a given day, a team that only has a couple of big chances can win against one than have 20 small ones even though the xG battle will be lost at the end.

That style of play Germany does is better suited for leagues where things evens out during a season. That's why teams like Pep's City fare extremely well in leagues but can crash out early in tournaments. It only takes one bad game there.

Germy's problem has for decades been that they haven't produced a proper striker. Munich and Dortmund's strikers have always been a foreigners.

So they have to rely on the team playing fantastically in order for them to win
 

mastermind

Rest In Power Kobe
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
62,057
Reputation
5,887
Daps
163,473
Germy's problem has for decades been that they haven't produced a proper striker. Munich and Dortmund's strikers have always been a foreigners.

So they have to rely on the team playing fantastically in order for them to win
For decades? They had Miroslav Klose in 2014?

The game is seeing a dearth of strikers.
 
Top