@
Czar you've got to learn how to argue better, make the post short so people can consume the information. Ain't nobody going to take your post serious with all those videos in one post...plus its slowing the page down from loading
Your bias towards me is amazing. I know you're not stupid and seen @
LionofJudah spamming the last two pages with a million videos.
Czar is saying that I didn't school him about ruddy but he believed the entire time that the OG Hebrews were white/black & mixed with something else. By American standards today they were black folks point blank. The mixing of the multitude was the different tribes/cultures they came from.
Yet another straw man argument.
Especially since I've mentioned being mixed
also applies to the mixing of multitudes from a tribal perspective. For example, once a foreigner joined with Israel, he and his descendants became one with the native-born Israelites. Just as a foreigner who joined with Egypt and embraced their culture became Egyptian. Or are you forgetting the Pharaohs of Nubian descent?
Then again, you're the same dude who claimed the Dravidians, who are mega dark, weren't black people cause they don't have woolly hair. Nevermind the fact that there were EGYPTIANS who didn't have woolly hair either. Yet we both agree they were black.
Talking about white supremacy, yet you wanna use "American standards" to define an ancient world
I would like Czar to explain how he hates the supposedly White Supremacy doctrine of Japheth, Shem, and Ham but he still supports that Japheth was white, Shem was mixed, and Ham was black when the bible doesn't state any of that. Also, how can Shem's people be 'mixed' and lived in the same area as when Cush the son of Ham...had Nimrod that was King of Babylon (Iraq). So Nimrod is black and king over all these mixed people? What that passage shows is that all those people were black back in those times with very if any racial mixing. The mixing refers to tribes not races. Moses even married a Kush woman.
Where do you get Japheth, Shem and Ham being a white supremacy doctrine? Like, how does one even come to such an asinine conclusion breh? If anything, you the one creating neurotic arguments centered around eurocentic theories.
Was Ham born in Africa, Japheth in Europe and Shem in Western Asia? Or did Ham's descendants MIGRATE between Mesopotamia and Africa, Japheth's descendants MIGRATE to the north and the Mediterranean, and Shem's descendants MIGRATE all across Mesopotamia? Or was Canaan not originally
a HAMITIC land.
And black kings ONLY ruled over other black people? Weren't the Moors once rulers of the Iberian Peninsula and Southern Italy?
Wasn't Timothy the son of a Greek father and Hebrew mother? (Acts 16:1-3) And didn't Drusilla marry Felix, a Roman procurator? (Acts 24:24)
So are you saying the Greeks (Javan) and Romans (Kittim) were black as well?
The racial Mixing came from Japheth and his descendants after the flood who went North mixing with Neanderthals that sprung all these other races on the earth. This very day white people have the most Neanderthal DNA in them. Neanderthal is not present day human dna. These are scientific facts. Nimrod and his people also mixed as well later because they were so 'full of sin' that they did any and everything. When the Good Angels came down 'in human form' to talk to Lot, those folks in Sodom wanted to have sex with them then as well. Lot had to barricade the door & the Good Angels had to blind them to keep them out.
God sent the flood with Noah to get rid of the Seed/Angel's children that were creating war and destruction on the Earth. This time period is brought up again in the New Testament as a reason why Jesus will come back and save his flock...which now is determined by your belief....but the devil still has a role to play out.
Breh... let's use critical thinking to refute your argument, especially since you wanna cherry pick science to fit your theory, yet reject it when it contradicts you.
You mentioned Neanderthal DNA, which means if there were Neanderthals there was also Homo habilis
, ergaster and erectus.
According to science, habilis, ergaster and erectus are the 1st, 2nd and 3rd evolutionary transitions in the Homo genus. Neanderthals are 5th, right before Homo Sapians. In the theory of evolution, Black people are the least evolved species in the Human family and Whites the most evolved.
Hmmm, I wonder who coulda created such a racist theory
Even worse, you're actually using it by try and create a correlation that doesn't exist
And while everything you said about Lot and the good angels, the Nephalim, Noah and the flood is scriptural... I still see you subtly trying to sneak in 1 Enoch, which is NOT scriptural, to try and piece things together.
Both Enochs (1 & 2) are false books. This is why only two groups (Ethiopic and Slavonic churches) use them in their bibles. Just the fact that 1 Enoch claims Lamech had a son who was white with rosy cheeks who "looked like the angels", along with claiming a so called angel named Phanuel is in charge of Repentance and Eternal life should be enough to raise red flags for you.
Especially since neither of those things is mentioned anywhere else in actual scripture.
But you love to argue moot points, so tell me when you're ready to come back with more conjecture and straw man arguments so we can wash, rinse, repeat.
Like when someone gets tired of yelling, does he tell someone to take over for awhile? 
Do you get lunch breaks like a real job? 