Speaking of continuity, I was scrollin through the CBR Spidey subforum and a poster had a great quote/perspective:
Another chimed in:
I dunno what the solution is, but another element is that the top brass (Disney, WB, Sony) only care about mining superhero IPs to feed into their actual money makers (films, games, theme parks, etc), which begets starter-kit versions of the characters that are "modernized" for current times (and not the 1960s packages)... which has a varying trickle down effect with the comics.
The single timeline was the innovation that reinvigorated superhero comics.
The sliding timeline was the innovation to stretch out its viability.
I sincerely doubt that was supposed to be the end of it, just the patch job that would work until someone came up with something better to maintain longevity.
Another chimed in:
I'm starting to appreciate Marvel as something different from one big ongoing story, better appreciated in discrete units (IE- Hickman's Avengers, Slott's Spider-Man) than pretending that a Lee/ Kirby comic published in 1964 is set a decade earlier than a comic book published and set in 2024.
The sliding timescale starts to collapse at a point. Anachronisms pop up. References hint at different things. The adventures of characters add up in weird ways.
I dunno what the solution is, but another element is that the top brass (Disney, WB, Sony) only care about mining superhero IPs to feed into their actual money makers (films, games, theme parks, etc), which begets starter-kit versions of the characters that are "modernized" for current times (and not the 1960s packages)... which has a varying trickle down effect with the comics.
Last edited: