Essential The Official Boxing Random Thoughts Thread...All boxing heads ENTER.

reservoirdogs

Superstar
Joined
Jun 1, 2016
Messages
12,701
Reputation
1,030
Daps
25,487
Breh, dude's opinions be all over the place. :mjlol:

Today he's down playing AB moving up to take Paulies belt (and his girl :shaq: )

but yesterday was going on about how GGG should move up to take Ramirez belt even though he's even less proven then Paulie ever was. :dahell:

Like is it black girl loss, or shorty owe you for ice. :mindblown:

I doN't downplay shyt, I never thought Paulie would be that good. Why we have to play this "but... but... he was a champion...."game when we are not casuals and we all know very well that sometimes undeserved fighters have belts. Nobody thought that Malignaggi was a credible champion. HE got his belt against Pablo Cesar Cano just one fight before the Broner one ffs... :mjlol:
Cano... the same man who got stopped by the 2011 version of Morales. :mjlol: He was Morales' last win. Paulie beat him on a close fight and got awarded with a belt. That's how big of a champion Paulie was in welterweight.



I only said that Postol vs Broner would be a 50-50 fight, Postol was never a bum and that Postol's win over Matthysse is better than any AB win 140 and up. I don't know why you, @#SOG_soldier and @Newzz are catching feelings over that. I guess you've met harder critics and slander on Brone.

:dahell: I've never said that beatig Gilberto Ramirez rn would be such a huge achievement for Golovkin, I've never said that he should move up jut to fight him I only said that it can be an interesting fight down the line and that eve know it would be more interesting than Golovkin vs random MW, maybe except Jacobs.
I said the Jack vs DeGale winner is the best possible fight for him there btw.

Broner 135 was clearly bigger than any of his LW opponents just he could make the weight for a while. So it was natural to him to move up in weight. I for one thought it's a stupid move to jump two weightclasses. He would be in a slight size disadvantage against most ww's. Against Paulie he wasn't btw, he was the bigger man... After that I was among the few people who picked Maidana to win and he did.
I never said that I don't give credit Broner for moving up two divisions just it was a stupid idea, all what I said is that Paulie Malignaggi isn't that great of a win for me... :yeshrug: and that I rate the beating of Matthysse higher. Idk what's so outrageous in that for you, since you've said those wins are on the same level in your opinion. I rate one of them a little higher than you or the other one little lower, idk... So what?
 
Last edited:

Newzz

"The Truth" always prevails
Supporter
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
44,924
Reputation
7,470
Daps
104,633
I doN't downplay shyt, I never thought Paulie would be that good. Why we have to play this "but... but... he was a champion...."game when we are not casuals and we all know very well that sometimes undeserved fighters have belts. Nobody thought that Malignaggi was a credible champion.

He was ranked the 4th best Welterweight by RING, ESPN, & TNBR entering the fight against Broner. You saying you didn't care for him means the exact same as me saying I never cared for Matthysse...except Malignaggi actually was able to become a 2 time Champion in his career while Matthysse has lost every time he went against one.

Again...the dude LOST to someone Malignaggi beat. Same Malignaggi you talking down on beat a fighter that Matthysse lost too.


HE got his belt against Pablo Cesar Cano just one fight before the Broner one ffs... :mjlol:
Cano... the same man who got stopped by the 2011 version of Morales. :mjlol: He was Morales' last win. Paulie beat him on a close fight and got awarded with a belt. That's how big of a champion Paulie was in welterweight.

Matthysse went life & death with John Molina...same Molina that was blanked by AB & KOd in 1 round by Antonio DeMarco. That's how good of a fighter Matthysse was at Junior Welterweight after getting his soul snatched by Danny Garcia.


Why you keep acting as if the Matthysse that Postol fought was some real threat after gettin his mental fukked & face broken by Swift is :mindblown: to me.



I only said that Postol vs Broner would be a 50-50 fight, Postol was never a bum and that Postol's win over Matthysse is better than any AB win 140 and up. I don't know why you, @#SOG_soldier and @Newzz are catching feelings over that. I guess you've met harder critics and slander on Brone.


Because we don't agree with you:dahell:


You're new here...you don't have any prediction or statements that have come true yet. We don't have to take your word as if you're proven to have good Boxing eyes yet, because you're not:heh:


You gotta earn that around here breh...just like we all had too:manny:







:dahell: I've never said that beatig Gilberto Ramirez rn would be such a huge achievement for Golovkin, I've never said that he should move up jut to fight him I only said that it can be an interesting fight down the line and that eve know it would be more interesting than Golovkin vs random MW, maybe except Jacobs.
I said the Jack vs DeGale winner is the best possible fight for him there btw.


You said he would receive credit strictly for beating bigger opponents....

Broner 135 was clearly bigger than any of his LW opponents just he could make the weight for a while.

No he wasn't:camby:


Antonio DeMarco was the taller/longer man in their fight :forreal:

So it was natural to him to move up in weight. I for one thought it's a stupid move to jump two weightclasses. He would be in a slight size disadvantage against most ww's. Against Paulie he wasn't btw, he was the bigger man... After that I was among the few people who picked Maidana to win and he did.
I never said that I don't give credit Broner for moving up two divisions just it was a stupid idea, all what I said is that Paulie Malignaggi isn't that great of a win for me... :yeshrug: and that I rate the beating of Matthysse higher. Idk what's so outrageous in that for you, since you've said those wins are on the same level in your opinion. I rate one of them a little higher than you or the other one little lower, idk... So what?


Then why are you arguing if we disagree and see it vice versa?:martin:


At the end of the day, Paulie Malignaggi best win is Juan Diaz, he beat the same Zab Judah that Matthysse couldn't beat, & he's a 2x Champion over 2 divisions. He has a better resume than Matthysse has...deal with it. Hyping this dude Matthysse bc his best win is Lamont Peterson...Lamont Peterson don't even have a better resume than Paulie Malignaggi and hasn't beaten anyone either:heh:


I'm done talking about this....agree to disagree.
 
Last edited:

ℒℴѵℯJay ELECTUA

Return of the Khryst
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
76,855
Reputation
9,099
Daps
117,752
Reppin
ℒℴѵℯJay ELECTUA
He was ranked the 4th b






At the end of the day, Paulie Malignaggi best win is Juan Diaz, he beat the same Zab Judah that Matthysse couldn't beat, & he's a 2x Champion over 2 divisions. He has a better resume than Matthysse has...deal with it. Hyping this dude Matthysse bc his best win is Lamont Peterson...Lamont Peterson don't even have a better resume than Paulie Malignaggi and hasn't beaten anyone either:heh:


He beat joe louis' Ass!
mnrRE.png
 

reservoirdogs

Superstar
Joined
Jun 1, 2016
Messages
12,701
Reputation
1,030
Daps
25,487

Peterson has a win over Danny Garcia on my scorecards and on many people scorecards... that's enough for me



I got tired of all of us repeating the same shyt while we talk above each other's head.
idk why it matters that I'm new here in this argument, I've never said that you should view me as some expert in predicting, it's okay that you don't agree with me on this, only thing which bothers me that you all got mad as shyt basically over the fact that I would give 50% chance to Postol against Broner.
You can be as mad as you want, you still won't change this Cause it's my opinion... :yeshrug:
It's not like I'd have talked shyt on your favourite or anything that's why I don't understand why are you three all up in your feelings now and why I have to argue with three people at the same time in fukking essays over why my opinion is what it is...

You disagree? I get it. You also get that I disagree with you. Fine.

I didn't want this to go personal and I'm sorry if I hurt the feelings of any of you three (no trolling) but I really don't feel that I was too harsh. I thought you heard enough shyt talking and slander against Broner from other people to not get mad over simply that I don't think he is an elite fighter at 140 and I would give Postol a decent chance against him which is hardly any slander since I rate Postol higher than you. :ehh:


I'm done with this argument with you, @#SOG_soldier and @LauderdaleBoss
let's concentrate on things we agree on there's enough


I'm out from this debate.
 
Top