That's not answering the question
If Lara goes ahead and faces GGG at the full 160 limit and gets beat all the way the fk down....a simple "GGG got his best win" aint gonna suffice for all the pom-pom waving going on for that fight right now. We are ASKING for GGG to face a much smaller man who doesn't like to sit down on his punches and doesn't like getting hit to the body either. If GGG destroys him, and Lara DOESNT make it to the finish line, what does that mean at the end of the day? Do we say. "
![damn :damn: :damn:](https://www.thecoli.com/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/damn.png)
GGG is a monster
![mindblown :mindblown: :mindblown:](https://www.thecoli.com/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/mindblown.png)
"...do we say "GGG did what he was supposed to do
![manny :manny: :manny:](https://www.thecoli.com/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/manny.png)
"...what's the end game? Lets not pretend like we REALLY care about GGG's resume, we don't. Even with his resume, we all acknowledge he's the best at his weight class and the favorite over every fighter who would agree to fight him at 160 who in fact do have better resumes.
Real talk, Im tired of seeing smaller fighters getting dragged up, abused, then sent back to their weight divisions where they belong
Lara should fight a 160lber first (even Daniel Geale), show that he can deal with a larger man's punch first, then move up. Lara is a good dude and I don't wanna see him "ruined" because other fighters at Middleweight don't wanna get in the ring with GGG. Peter Quillin, Daniel Jacobs, Billy Joe Saunders, Andy Lee, Chris Eubank...somebody come forward