exactly. so again, what makes you think Maidana is better than Paulie or kicks his ass in a fight? not saying Paulie definitely wins....but saying this....Paulie has had a good career. Maidana has as well, but Maidana's biggest wins had a lot to do with timing. the Broner fight in particular. I posted a while back that Broner shouldnt take a fight at 147 (after Paulie), he should go to 140. Paulie basically gave the recipe and Maidana added power to the ingredients. I could name 10 welterweights that couldve beaten Broner that night. I would gladly back Paulie if he and Maidana were to fight in the near future.
I explained why Maidana beats Paulie in the very first post on the subject. Paulie in my eyes struggled and lost to Cano who has a similar style to Maidana. I feel Maidana is a better overall fighter than Cano since he's more powerful, more relentless, and doesn't gas during the course of the fight. He's like all of Cano's strengths magnified, but with better stamina, more power, and more experience. They both struggled with a shot to shyt Morales, but only one of them actually got the win. I think Maidana would look lost during some early spots of the fight, but would eventually end up putting hands on Paulie and winning a clear decision. (116- 112 or 117-111) type of fight. Might even get a knockdown.
I would say Paulie has had the better career achievement wise due to winning titles and that's barely, but both are basically on the same level to me, but just at opposites ends of the spectrum when it comes to boxing styles (boxer- brawler) I look at both dudes as B- boxers.
Paulie's best wins were against C level dudes (Cherry, Ngoudjo, N'dou) or good fighters that were past their primes (Juan Diaz and Zab)
Maidana's best wins are against Broner and Ortiz. Which are wayyyy better wins than what Paulie has. The thing is Maidana's losses have come up against guys who are usually on his level (B minus type fighters in (Alexander, Khan, Kotelnik) while Paulie's losses have come to guys who were elite or once were/became (Cotto, Hatton)
I don't see how I can explain this shyt any better. Paulie isn't some scrub, but he's not worlds above Maidana and him losing to dude isn't all that far fetched. They really on the same level. It's just that I feel Paulie is more vulnerable to losing due to his style than Maidana is and it isn't because he has brittle hands. It's because of his leaky defense.
A prime Corey Spinks would out box Maidana because in the end he got hit less, but I doubt any version of Paulie could.