The fact that he's one of the brightest spots of this movie speaks to the level of fukkery and quality.
The Official Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice Movie Thread
- Thread starter Jello Biafra
- Start date
The fact that he's one of the brightest spots of this movie speaks to the level of fukkery and quality.
Still FloW
Gawd Of Shinobi
Yup and my question for everyone in here... stan.. no stan.. hater.. whatever. My question is why SHOULD Batman v. Superman be 'fun'? A bunch of people fukkING DIED. Why would @Bruce Wayne want to joke around about that? Why wouldn't humans be reevaluating this super hero shyt? It makes no sense at all for this movie to be humorous.
Critics are retarded
Because marvel stans need some cheering up and warm fun from their obvious boring lives... thats why the dark tone is bad for them, it reminds them of their grim lives smh...
apparently, movies only work in 1 tone now smh
Saysumthinfunnymike
VOTE!!!
really breh? u expected this to be ironman 2 status? as many posts as u have in this thread u didnt even expect it to be better than MoS?i call bullshyt, point blank
I wasn't high on the casting of Eisenberg and I did not like the inclusion of Doomsday who I hate.. but I do have high expectations for a lot of the other shyt in there, mostly Affleck's portrayal of Wayne and a new Batman. No need to try to get inside my head, I'll tell you straight up how I think, there is no agenda with me.
I think it will still be a cool movie.I just know the beginning is going to be slow as fukk.Last hour or so should be fire.I hope.Why are people happy this movie is apparently bad? Y'all take these stab wars too seriously. I just want a good flick
I'm actually most hype about aqua man
You tell me. It's not like these critics aren't either CORPORATELY bought or biased fanboys themselves. Nah, that's impossible!
Breh.. ALL of them though
TDKR got a 87%
300 got a 60% and the sequel got a 42% Watchmen got a 65%
MAYBE.. just maybe Snyder doesn't know how to make good movies (once you strip the visuals away) He hovers around the good/bad line and for whatever reason he had his shot with MOS and got a 56%. He has a track record of trending down once given an opportunity to make a sequel.
Why can't they just make doomsday look like doomsday?He's one of the best and most unique looking super villains.fukking hollywood,smh.They overthink everything.
Lord_Chief_Rocka
Superstar
They're reviewing this worse than batman forever
They're reviewing this worse than batman forever
Batman forever wasn't that bad. For 1994 it was a dope flick. And it was better than the sequel.
yo this is one of the realest posts in the thread
The fun thing keeps coming up because we're nearing that warm weather blockbuster time, people want to take their kids to see it, and it's a comic book movie. This is supposed to launch DC's film universe so god forbid people expect to enjoy themselves. A movie can be dark and fun. Nolan's Batman was and SS appears to be that. People are upset because they think it's dark and dull.
Plan A: start celebrating DC's victory once the glowing reviews and 90% RT score come in. Reviews dropped and
"Reviews don't matter."
Plan B: wait for the regular people to see it and weigh in. If the people give it mixed reviews then Plan C: wait for the box office #'s.
Saysumthinfunnymike
VOTE!!!
Oh is that why Sharknado has an 82% on RT? Because of the acting and visuals and the story
AnonymityX1000
Veteran
A) That's a serious allegation to make with 0 proof. And if that's the case, seeems it's the cost of doing business what's DC/Warner's problem? They are a billion dollar company to.You tell me. It's not like these critics aren't either CORPORATELY bought or biased fanboys themselves. Nah, that's impossible!
B) If they are fanboys that speaks to how they feel about the material.
There is no conspiracy sorry .
