yes and no.
as, it was said in exposition.
yet the way bp is nerfed on film.
to trump up kilmonger.
over time if not well written.
could created decline of a draw to the bp movie series.
as it creates a divisive hero element in bp.
which was actually well written.
So only bp's wakanda only type vibe was never rolled over on to the silver screen version.
from the original take on why bp was So polarizing slash divisive in print originally in the comics, whether black or white. Yet the undercurrent of the responsibility of protecting vibranium over-rode the divisive element.
as later on in print tchaka was created from tchala to allow.[sorry i forget, sometimes the names differene between pop or son in the changing of making BP more accessible]
this non-divisive element of disconnnct could eventually be written into a positive of the series.
yet since this is the silver screen version. that dynamic is paired down brilliantly in the malleability of the film version. While never losing sight of this divisive element and courageously attacking it head on. In the declaration of bp confronting his elders and asking why: Killmonger was not brought home.
which is what creates the foundational brilliance of bp being adapted to film. Yet in this whole dichotomy of a juggling act.
to bring bp to film in this manner of the mcu timeline. In that, certain elements of the mcu have to be malleable.
in the drawing balance of the work.
to continue to allow it to be an adaptive drawing vehicle for marvel/disney. In that, balance is where eventually reed Richards needs to be brought aboard. To give headway to both shuri and also black planet being deemed intellectual equals. While also not nerf'n, blindsiding and ruining the draw and brilliance of the panther as an intellectually superior hero to all of the mcu. That also never loses sight that marvel does not need to revisit failed attempts to un-earth black panther as a male. in favor of already previously failed attempts to nerf black panther for shuri as thr nee female bp as wellm
which would revisit the dark ages and decline in draw.
that eventually created why marvel does not own itself anymore as well.
so on film,...moving forward.
black panther has to showcase being an intellectual superior to all the mcu. Then as a possible auxilliary.
have shuri as even more of an intellectual superior to black panther. Yet, in that black panther can not continue on film as a drawing hero. If they never establish in the mcu. That black panther as a male is intellectually superior.
to everyone but shuri in the mcu.
well if the idea continues that shuri is intellectually superior and bp is never established. It does nUffin but retread over the same dead drawing ground that ruined why marvel is owned by disney.
plus it reverts the mcu as a whole. Into the same decline in draw semantics. That dc does not understand when they killed supes and broke bats back. Then failed to understand not to have the wherewithal.
not to ever revisit that inept editorial declining draw decision on film in batman v Superman, the third dk and justice league.
if the mcu revisit decline in draw semantics on film.
like they have it currently set up.
they completely run thr risk of making the entire decline draw of the fall of comics. To recreate itself in the death of the mcu film division and market as well.
in an age where ineptitude is rampantly high in corporate America. If you fail to know the background of the arena and business integrally. You will be doomed to repeat the same results of doom. That made disney come to own marvel. Except internally the mcu becomes a dead draw.
like star wars on that bicepless ass mouse's watch once again.
so the idea of shuri being an understudy.
needs to be compartmentalized. or put in better context in the mcu. As undermining black panther in the mcu in any way movng forward. Sets forth franchise declining draw based semantics.
that you can not ever escape once you open Pandora's box.
to allow shuri to continue to appear the intellectual superior to bp on film.
art barr