The movies in pre production with MarvelF4 is dead. FAUX ruined them and they wont give up so its pointless
Marvel's Fantastic Four reboot: everything we know
The movies in pre production with MarvelF4 is dead. FAUX ruined them and they wont give up so its pointless
you can not have Norman Osbourne show up.
without spidey and Gwen Stacy.
As it carries no heft or weight.
plus it revisits the decline in draw.
that has made spiderman one of the worst read since the spider clones.
which is also another integral reason.
WHY marvel does not STILL OWN THEMSELVES.
y'all nikkaz some casuals at best in comics.
just like every other reason we here on this forum.
you better do a discovery zone and ramp.
y'all sound as inept as Kathleen Kennedy running star wars.
art barr
The rights 2 marvel to make a F4 movie
I had to double check to see this wasn't upped from 2018 or something. You do know Disney bought out Fox right? They own X-men and Fantasic Four now.The rights 2 marvel to make a F4 movie
where have you been breh?
The word on the street is Christian Bale is about to be announced as Norman Osbourne.
So called marvel insiders been chatting it......this apparently lead to the dark avengers
Not in BP2.
Norman Osbourne would be showing up in Spiderman 3, alongside Harry and Gwen obviously.
Any authentic Spiderman fan knows who spider man's arch nemesis is, and it is about time he shows up in the MCU to make the situation really critical. Vulture was cool, Mysterio was cool, but Norman is that guy. I understand we had to give a bit of a gap since the Raimi movies but now is the time.
We aint waiting till Spider man 6.
yes and no.
as, it was said in exposition.
yet the way bp is nerfed on film.
to trump up kilmonger.
over time if not well written.
could created decline of a draw to the bp movie series.
as it creates a divisive hero element in bp.
which was actually well written.
So only bp's wakanda only type vibe was never rolled over on to the silver screen version.
from the original take on why bp was So polarizing slash divisive in print originally in the comics, whether black or white. Yet the undercurrent of the responsibility of protecting vibranium over-rode the divisive element.
as later on in print tchaka was created from tchala to allow.[sorry i forget, sometimes the names differene between pop or son in the changing of making BP more accessible]
this non-divisive element of disconnnct could eventually be written into a positive of the series.
yet since this is the silver screen version. that dynamic is paired down brilliantly in the malleability of the film version. While never losing sight of this divisive element and courageously attacking it head on. In the declaration of bp confronting his elders and asking why: Killmonger was not brought home.
which is what creates the foundational brilliance of bp being adapted to film. Yet in this whole dichotomy of a juggling act.
to bring bp to film in this manner of the mcu timeline. In that, certain elements of the mcu have to be malleable.
in the drawing balance of the work.
to continue to allow it to be an adaptive drawing vehicle for marvel/disney. In that, balance is where eventually reed Richards needs to be brought aboard. To give headway to both shuri and also black panther being deemed intellectual equals. While also not nerf'n, blindsiding and ruining the draw and brilliance of the panther.
as an intellectually superior hero to all of the mcu. That also never loses sight.
that marvel does not need to revisit failed attempts.
to un-earth black panther as a male. in favor of already previously failed attempts.
to nerf black panther for shuri as the new female bp as well
which would revisit the dark ages and decline in draw.
that eventually created why marvel does not own itself anymore as well.
so on film,...moving forward.
black panther has to showcase being an intellectual superior to all the mcu. Then as a possible auxilliary.
have shuri as even more of an intellectual superior to black panther. Yet, in that black panther can not continue on film as a drawing hero. If they never establish in the mcu. That black panther as a male is intellectually superior.
to everyone but shuri in the mcu.
well if the idea continues.
that shuri is intellectually superior and bp is never established. It does nUffin but retread.
over the same dead drawing ground.
that ruined why marvel is owned by disney.
plus it reverts the mcu as a whole. Into the same decline in draw semantics. That dc does not understand.
when they killed supes and broke bats back.
Then failed to understand not to have the wherewithal.
not to ever revisit.
that inept editorial declining draw decision on film.
featurdd in batman v Superman, the third dk and justice league.
if the mcu revisit decline in draw semantics on film.
like they have it currently set up.
they completely run the risk.
of making the entire declining draw of the fall of comics. To recreate itself in the death of the mcu film division and market as well.
in an age where ineptitude is rampantly high in corporate America. If you fail to know the background of the arena and business integrally. You will be doomed to repeat the same results of doom. That made disney come to own marvel. Except internally the mcu becomes a dead draw.
like star wars on that bicepless ass mouse's watch once again.
so the idea of shuri being an understudy.
needs to be compartmentalized. or put in better context in the mcu. As undermining black panther in the mcu in any way movng forward. Sets forth franchise declining draw based semantics.
that you can not ever escape once you open Pandora's box.
to allow shuri to continue to appear the intellectual superior to bp on film.
art barr
"I'm not white, I'm Von-Doom"