Trapperman Dave
Basil Fawty
Maybe in the tier of Ironman 3 or thor 2. Long as it’s not eternal status it should be watchable
The Marvels Starring Brie Larson, Teyonah Parris, Iman Vellani, and Sam Jackson November 10,2023
- Thread starter humminbird
- Start date
I'll watch, on Disney+.
Slim
Superstar
I'll watch this when it gets to Disney+ since I liked the Captain Marvel and Ms. Marvel shows but this shyt is about to flop hard!!
yeah I`m just heading to reddit for spoiler confirmation when this drops lmfao
Gizmo_Duck
blathering blatherskite!
I’ll watch it on flixtor
Aquaman will also join the bomb...
OmegaK2099
Gettin' It In
Lol
If it does bomb, it'll more-so be an indictment on Feige, the MCU, and Disney for not having a real plan for the character. To the general public, Cap Marvel was a blank slate no one knew nothing about other than she's "apparently" the Wonder Woman/Supergirl for Marvel... which was enough to get the Barbie demo to show up for CM1. (the A:IW stimulus package is moot, bc MCU Spidey ate off Civil War, RDJ, End Game, etc,. That shyt is par the course, but doesn't gurantee lucrative success unless there's an inherent appeal).
Put another way: 150 million budget, peak good will of the MCU brand, blank canvas to make a "superman in space" story with any hot blonde actress in Hollywood... give her any personality bc nobody reads or gives a fukk about actual comic books... yet a stiff, lifeless, mid depiction was the best they could come up with? $1 billion worth of eyes tuning in and that was the product they sold? Tch
Then they shelved her for 90% of End Game (likely bc they didn't have a plan for her or her abilities), when she actually needed screen time with the OGs for audiences to actually get the personality that was shelved in her own solo movie lol. The character will be "blamed" but they sabo'd her bad.
Put another way: 150 million budget, peak good will of the MCU brand, blank canvas to make a "superman in space" story with any hot blonde actress in Hollywood... give her any personality bc nobody reads or gives a fukk about actual comic books... yet a stiff, lifeless, mid depiction was the best they could come up with? $1 billion worth of eyes tuning in and that was the product they sold? Tch
Then they shelved her for 90% of End Game (likely bc they didn't have a plan for her or her abilities), when she actually needed screen time with the OGs for audiences to actually get the personality that was shelved in her own solo movie lol. The character will be "blamed" but they sabo'd her bad.
Nope. New spidey, batman, joker, hell even deadpool or X-men doing numbers. Disney has just done a shyt job of building new characters post end game.
If Chadwick wasn't sick you'd think End game woulda been BP, strange, and Cap Marvel taking lead most the flick to set up the future era
Saysumthinfunnymike
VOTE!!!
If they wanted to continue towards an Avengers arc without Cap/Stark then the natural move would be to make Spider-Man the focal point of the group as he's the most popular character and then everyone else could get the stimulus off him. But that also points to how dumb it is that Disney/Marvel never bought the rights back from Sony.
Make no mistake, I'm glad they didn't because then we wouldn't have the 'Spiderverse' movies.
Make no mistake, I'm glad they didn't because then we wouldn't have the 'Spiderverse' movies.
You can't buy something if no one is willing to sell it.
Sony is never gonna give up the rights to Spider-Man, and I don't blame them.
Fred.
Ironman
#Knickstape
That was the plan they were supposed to be the big 3 for the next phase.