Tears of the Gamers. it aint that seriousfucc a zelda breh
Tears of the Gamers. it aint that seriousfucc a zelda breh
Bro its halfway there in 5 days..it'll be there before end of june...It's going to sell 20 million before the year ends
Sony CEO says he wants to invest in a IP aka a brand that can survive, 30, 50 100 years like Mario.
But I'm the crazy "Xbox" Nintendo Stan
Sony CEO says he wants to invest in a IP aka a brand that can survive, 30, 50 100 years like Mario.
But I'm the crazy "Xbox" Nintendo Stan
It's all obvious and retrospect huh? Yet y'all nikkas argue me down.nikka you be saying the most obvious shyt and then bumping a thread patting yourself on the back.
Mario is associated with Nintendo’s branding because it’s the biggest exclusive franchise to a platform. Your word salad shyt don’t work over here
Nothing you say will absolve Microsoft of having to make good games
nikka stfu
Unfortunately, the squandered the R&C movie and subsequent game that tied into it got a bit of flack because of the movie as well (I think the game was actually still solid tho IIRC). But yeah, if they put more effort into the movie, it could work again. The games are still A-1.PlayStation has Ratchet and Clank. They just need to be more aggressive with Ratchet and Clank like Nintendo is with Mario. Ratchet and Clank has so much potential!!! I remember playing it on PS3 back in the day it felt like I was playing a Cartoon CGI movie. I haven't played the last two games but I bet the quality is just as high. They also had a movie right? It probably didn't perform well because there wasn't sufficient build up or hype around it compared to Mario movie which had all these famous stars and controversy.
It's all obvious and retrospect huh? Yet y'all nikkas argue me down.
I say exclusives are a important but not the end all be all, y'all say "but Nintendo" I then say Nintendo is on a different level they have brands and y'all proceed to teehee and hahaha about how it's the same thing.
And yet, you still trying to attribute Mario and Zelda success to being associated with exclusivity.
That ship has sailed a long time ago. It has nothing to do exclusivity. They are house hold brands that happen to be exclusive. Sony doesn't have anything like this and neither does MS. Outside of the systems themselves.
Somehow you always manage to tie Microsoft into the Convo when this has nothing to do with Microsoft
amazing
Damn that’s messed up.Unfortunately, the squandered the R&C movie and subsequent game that tied into it got a bit of flack because of the movie as well (I think the game was actually still solid tho IIRC). But yeah, if they put more effort into the movie, it could work again. The games are still A-1.
He said he wants enduring IP. I’ve only played one Ratchet and Clank and it was on PS3. That shyt.. I give it a 10/10. 5 fukking stars. That game was perfect. It made me want to play more of the games etc. I think it has potential for an enduring IP. It has great platforming just like Mario. In some ways it’s better than Mario.also, im not sure what ratchet and clank has to do with the convo, it will never be an IP on the level of mario, no platformer will. Thats not what sony means when they say they want longevity in IP.
They already have IP that are almost 30 years old, Gran Turismo and Twisted Metal are pushing the 30 year mark, God of War i almost 20 and R&C is 21. If they launch a new Syphon Filter that will be 30 years old
The only thing sony need to do is keep making hit games