Don’t get me wrong- does she need to be questioned/on trial? Nah.Because it’s not. The entire defense theory is predicted on the ludicrous assertion that she only filed this RICO case against trump to generate money for her boyfriend. And the defense trying to set a perjury trap by using ambiguous terms for things like personal relationship.
That first point is so asanine giving there’s a phone call from Trump talking about find me some votes. And all the evidence of a plan to disrupt the counting.
If this wasn’t yet another instance of Trump getting every possible benefit of the doubt and the system bending over backwards to make his dumb ass cult hopefully accept the results, this motion to disqualify would be laughed out of court.
But the shyt is a BAAAAAAAAD LOOK. Don’t shyt where you eat is a very common, well known phrase. It’s really that simple.