SmokyQuartz
Young Skull
Dina: Why didn't they kill you and Tommy?
Ellie: Maybe their just dumb
Dina:
Ellie: Maybe their just dumb
Dina:
Come on breh
are you really going to justify a 14 year old making that decision... now that doesn’t make any sense
and I have absolutely no idea where you’re getting the fact that I am trying to have some type of mental gymnastics to justify what Joel did I could care less about that outcome the only question I pose from day 1 is .... does Abby‘s father the doctor and you can throw in Marlene as well - have the right to take Ellie life ?
I'm really starting to think @surf is right and you never played any of the games, the general theme of the entire series just went over your head....
Does any character in the game have the right to take anyone's life? No, but that didn't stop them from killing people constantly...Joel included. And they did what they thought was necessary to survive and that's killing a ton of fukking people. Abby's father literally said they can save millions of lives and all the bullshyt they went through is justified with one act. There is no decision to make here, its literally....
1. Save millions of lives, which literally benefits everyone still alive on earth. (I don't wanna hear anything about maybe they couldn't mass produce the vaccine or maybe it wouldn't work. That shyt is dumb, its a video game and the writers framed it in a way that made it seem Abby's father could do it somehow. So it is what it is....he could make the vaccine.)
2. Save Ellie, which only benefits Joel and she hates him for it.
Any normal person would sacrifice Ellie in this situation. Even Ellie would sacrifice Ellie
LMAO!!!! The Fireflies were written to be incompetent throughout the whole first game but now these nikkas could make a vaccine for a fukking fungus (which has never been done before) AND mass produce it when the Government already done pretty much wiped these nikkas out and are actively hunting them down? Marlene was even talking about how they lost people on the trip from Boston but these goofy ass nikkas who couldn't get from point A to point B without fukking up are gonna save the world? The writers can frame whatever they want it still has to make sense, if it doesn't that's what bad writing is. Talking bout some ole "could do it somehow" nikka stopI'm really starting to think @surf is right and you never played any of the games, the general theme of the entire series just went over your head....
Does any character in the game have the right to take anyone's life? No, but that didn't stop them from killing people constantly...Joel included. And they did what they thought was necessary to survive and that's killing a ton of fukking people. Abby's father literally said they can save millions of lives and all the bullshyt they went through is justified with one act. There is no decision to make here, its literally....
1. Save millions of lives, which literally benefits everyone still alive on earth. (I don't wanna hear anything about maybe they couldn't mass produce the vaccine or maybe it wouldn't work. That shyt is dumb, its a video game and the writers framed it in a way that made it seem Abby's father could do it somehow. So it is what it is....he could make the vaccine.)
2. Save Ellie, which only benefits Joel and she hates him for it.
Any normal person would sacrifice Ellie in this situation. Even Ellie would sacrifice Ellie
LMAO!!!! The Fireflies were written to be incompetent throughout the whole first game but now these nikkas could make a vaccine for a fukking fungus (which has never been done before) AND mass produce it when the Government already done pretty much wiped these nikkas out and are actively hunting them down? Marlene was even talking about how they lost people on the trip from Boston but these goofy ass nikkas who couldn't get from point A to point B without fukking up are gonna save the world? The writers can frame whatever they want it still has to make sense, if it doesn't that's what bad writing is. Talking bout some ole "could do it somehow" nikka stop
I'm really starting to think @surf is right and you never played any of the games...
With characters name Joel, Ellie, Abby, Dina = sounds like a game for cacs
But whether if he’s a scumbag or not isn’t important. What’s important is who I was riding for. Who my loyalty was to. And that was Joel.
Where was it stated that he had murdered children before?
No offense but you wouldn’t have survived long with that mentality especially when food and resources are scarce and hard to come by. They weren’t just robbing them for the hell of it, but more so to survive.
You can make the case that Joel going back to Tommy’s and developing his mentality is what got him killed in the first place. He got too comfortable and let his guard down.
Mostly implied but he killed innocent civilians and when you start looking around the Raiders little facility, you start seeing the clothes and shoes of loads of people with the Raiders documenting everything they got. The game framed that entire segment as “Joel knows how this goes because he’s done these exact same things before”.
We know kids exist in the world, Joel was willing to leave Ellie to die in the beginning of the game, and is pretty morally repugnant. He barely even shows remorse for all the people he’s killed.
So you’re saying you’d prey on weaker civilians, women, and innocents if it came down to it?
Ellie was able to hunt and find food in the winter to survive for a prolonged period of time but Joel was forced to murder innocent civilians? We know wildlife is still around too.
Those are the only people with resources or were they just the easiest to get?
And again, you can rob people without killing them too yet we can tell by Tommie and Joel’s reaction that they weren’t just taking their stuff to send them on their way.
But we’re different. We’re in the middle of a pandemic and I still can’t imagine saying “Ayy, we need to focus on robbing and killing the elderly, women, and innocents” simply to survive.
The Last of Us: American Dreams - Wikipedia
I know the story kinda gets confusing
but the truth is Marlene met Ellie for the 1st time when she was 14 years old at the boarding school with Riley her new friend/ future young lover
and only about a month later Marlene hires Joel and Tess to deliver her
so once again, Ellie hardly/barely even knows Marlene
I'm really starting to think @surf is right and you never played any of the games, the general theme of the entire series just went over your head....
Does any character in the game have the right to take anyone's life? No, but that didn't stop them from killing people constantly...Joel included. And they did what they thought was necessary to survive and that's killing a ton of fukking people. Abby's father literally said they can save millions of lives and all the bullshyt they went through is justified with one act. There is no decision to make here, its literally....
1. Save millions of lives, which literally benefits everyone still alive on earth. (I don't wanna hear anything about maybe they couldn't mass produce the vaccine or maybe it wouldn't work. That shyt is dumb, its a video game and the writers framed it in a way that made it seem Abby's father could do it somehow. So it is what it is....he could make the vaccine.)
2. Save Ellie, which only benefits Joel and she hates him for it.
Any normal person would sacrifice Ellie in this situation. Even Ellie would sacrifice Ellie
LMAO!!!! The Fireflies were written to be incompetent throughout the whole first game but now these nikkas could make a vaccine for a fukking fungus (which has never been done before) AND mass produce it when the Government already done pretty much wiped these nikkas out and are actively hunting them down? Marlene was even talking about how they lost people on the trip from Boston but these goofy ass nikkas who couldn't get from point A to point B without fukking up are gonna save the world? The writers can frame whatever they want it still has to make sense, if it doesn't that's what bad writing is. Talking bout some ole "could do it somehow" nikka stop
I disagree. Nah breh I think a lot of people would have made the same selfish decision that Joel did. They’d be lying if they said that they didn’t.
The parental side of him kicked in at that moment eventhough she wasn’t biologically his daughter.
So why are you riding for Joel and why are you loyal to him? Outside of the fact that you’re playing him.
I’m not even sure it should be considered a selfish act
I can’t even fathom a grown ass man allowing a 14 year old child to make a life or death decision like this
its bananas, if anyone thinks otherwise