USSInsiders
Banned
What you saying is a fumble friend
Nope, you can catch a ball for a half a second or two, but if it's muffed or knocked out prior to a football move being made then it's just an incomplete.
What you saying is a fumble friend
These nikkas don't watch football. It's clear
I can't believe ppl are still arguing this shyt. If you don't know this rule by now, then you're either a very casual fan of football, or a complete idiot. It's happened so many times over the past few years, that knowing the catch was gonna be overturned should've already been expected when they went to break for the review.You don't have possession until you complete the process going to the ground. It pops out when it hits the ground before he ever secured it all the way, then goes back in his hands when he goes for the stretch. The refs followed the rule exactly.
and that's why you're on the couch being a video game NFLermccarthy should be fired on the spot for that challenge
These nikkas don't watch football. It's clear
I can't believe ppl are still arguing this shyt. If you don't know this rule by now, then you're either a very casual fan of football, or a complete idiot. It's happened so many times over the past few years, that knowing the catch was gonna be overturned should've already been expected when they went to break for the review.
Like I said earlier, hate the rule all you want, but it was applied correctly in this situation. I think (most) Cowboys fans know it deep down, they're just mad, and need a scapegoat. So be it.
I can't believe ppl are still arguing this shyt. If you don't know this rule by now, then you're either a very casual fan of football, or a complete idiot. It's happened so many times over the past few years, that knowing the catch was gonna be overturned should've already been expected when they went to break for the review.
Like I said earlier, hate the rule all you want, but it was applied correctly in this situation. I think (most) Cowboys fans know it deep down, they're just mad, and need a scapegoat. So be it.
Contribute something meaningful to the convo homeboy. Negged.
But yeah, it's possible a part of Dez's body touched before the his outstretched hand with the secured ball hit. Cant tell from the views.
Yes, he caught it, secured it, and possessed it...but then he didn't. You don't seem to understand the concept of "completing the catch". He didn't catch it on the run. He caught it in the air, and stumbled forward to the ground. That means he has to keep possession the entire time. When he hit the ground, the ball hit the ground and popped loose. I repeat, the ball HIT THE GROUND, and POPPED LOOSE. That's not maintaining possession. But if you've been watching football close enough the past few years, you already knew that, and you're arguing just to argue.Nicca. He caught it. Secured it. Possessed it. tooks steps with the ball in one hand. and stretched the secured and possessed ball across the goaline. Fukk outta here.
Yes, he caught it, secured it, and possessed it...but then he didn't. You don't seem to understand the concept of "completing the catch". He didn't catch it on the run. He caught it in the air, and stumbled forward to the ground. That means he has to keep possession the entire time. When he hit the ground, the ball hit the ground and popped loose. I repeat, the ball HIT THE GROUND, and POPPED LOOSE. That's not maintaining possession. But if you've been watching football close enough the past few years, you already knew that, and you're arguing just to argue.