Breh no matter what theory (well yours is a theory, mine isnt but lets go wit it), helium reduces weight. An empty balloon, will not float into the air. But if its filled with helium? Into the air it goes. Your ramblings dont matter that shows that in EITHER scenario, helium reduces weight.
Now your wacky belief says that a force can hold down 1000 lbs, but not 1 (theoretically). It says the sun forces the earth to orbit it, but doesnt force the moon to orbit it. See I dont believe anything from the establishment wholeheartedly. Not their religions. Not their politics. Not their governments. Not their science. Why? Because why would a black man, who saw his ancestors or other black men oppressed for 300+ years prior, absolutely trust what that very same establishment presents to him wholeheartedly? It makes absolutely no sense. You trust what they gave you when it comes to science. I dont. Not that there isnt truth in it, but that alot of what they're pitching is agenda.
You only believe all that shyt about the spinning ball earth, because you were taught it. Not because you observed ANYTHING that supported it on its own merit. While my view, has support on its own merit. But cacs give you excuses as to why thats the case, and yall run with it. Cant explain nothing without referring to what they taught you
Helium doesn't reduce weight, it reduces density, you can't make an object weigh less without altering it's mass, that's not a theory, that's a fact. Helium has a quantifiable molecular weight. And using YOUR theory you never answered why a balloon would encounter less air resistance than a baseball. The same frictional effect of an air mass that slows down a baseball should slow down a much larger balloon. There is a very fundamental reason why changing the density of an object changes the gravitational force acting on it. But we're cooking with your theory right now. Why does air not slow down a larger, lower density object, but slows down a higher density, smaller object?
When the wind blows does it not move all things, including balloons? if I put a balloon in a cylinder, and put an industrial fan on top of the cylinder, a higher density object like a baseball will actually go up higher than a less denser object like a balloon?! 
Forget about CACs, let's look at the inherent contradiction in your theory. Does the balloon not have a lower density than the air circulating through the fan? So why doesn't it go as high as a baseball when I throw it against an air mass flow? Why does a low density object such as a balloon not travel as far as a high density object such as a baseball against an air mass flow of the same density moving with the same force in both instances?
Last edited:
He's f*cked so he keeps bobbing and weaving with vague answers, floating balloons, and a few CACs thrown in here and there for good measure 
So much for "logic"
Certain things you can argue about, gravity is not one of them. More annoying is when these types argue their ideas on computers and tablets and cell phones while driving their car to go work in a skyscraper, all of which were designed based on laws he is saying don't exist 
