Books, while valuable, are increasingly antiquated in the digital age. Visual and interactive learning methods offer richer, more immersive experiences. For example, historical documentaries bring the past to life more vividly than text. Coding is grasped quicker through hands-on tutorials than dense manuals. In biology, VR headsets allow students to explore and interact with complex systems, making learning more engaging and intuitive. Books cannot replicate the immediacy and dynamism of these experiences. As technology advances, it enables more effective and experiential learning, rendering traditional books less relevant in education and skill acquisition.
This looks like some stock copy written by the salesman for an online learning program.
Of course there can be some positives for interactive learning, but I don't think it's a universal win like you're making it out to be. Keeping things short, I'd say:
1. The act of reading and interpreting text helps your brain work and grow. This builds it in a way you may never get from passively watching video.
2. You can intake text faster from reading than you can from spoken words.
3. It is usually easier to cross-reference difference pages on a book simultaneously than it is to look at two different parts of a video or tutorial simultaneously.
4. The vast majority of "interactive learning experiences" are taking their material straight from books. Without the books, they wouldn't even have access to that information in the first place. There remains 100x as much important, useful information stored in books as there is available in online tutorials, and even when AI begins to streamline the process of creating online learning from written material, who is going to produce that written material from which the AI can build the online resource?
5. The use of screens to learn has proven immensely distracting for students. Whereas people used to sit and read from books for hours on end, most students find it extremely difficult to focus on online learning without constantly leaving to check their social media, email, other videos, etc. Even when they're not checking those things, research shows that learning is hampered by the mere act of
thinking about checking those things. The student learning off of a computer or phone is constantly distracted by the thought of other things they could be doing on that computer/phone.
If computer-based learning were merely superior, then we would have seen a noticeable rise in student outcomes once computer learning was introduced into the learning experience. Instead, we've seen the opposite. The more omnipresent screens have become, the worse students are doing. Tech boosters keep telling us, "But this is the only way!" and "Really, it will be better!" and "Trust the process!", but we're not seeing that.
And I haven't even gotten into how computer-based learning makes it so much easier for corporations to manipulate learners, insert ads and control the learning experience to meet their particular objectives.
I'm looking up at my bookshelf right now and even if I just picked my top 25 books on the shelf, the amount of wisdom in those books is incomparable. You can't replicate that with online tutorials, not even 1000 tutorials would give you what I've taken in from those books.