Attacking the paint is just as effective as shooting 3s - they're the two most efficient shots in the game. What is it exactly you're saying here, peckerwood?
Attacking the paint is just as effective as shooting 3s - they're the two most efficient shots in the game. What is it exactly you're saying here, peckerwood?
Honestly we've seen lower seeds beat higher seeds in this scenario too
The Hawks won Game 1 when the Bucks went 7.
We've seen the Heat defeat the Celtics big 3 in the bubble.
As a bettor it's really been an autoplay for me. I have it hitting literally 60 percent of the time and when you consider that the team that wins game 1 wins the series 70% of the time, it's a gigantic advantage.
Stop falling for that old narrative.. to say oh we took 50 threes is basically to imply we didn’t take it too the basket not once.. which is disingenuous
What about all the calls away from the ball? They let that shyt go when the lakers was fouling us away from the ball but repeatedly calling fouls on us for the same shyt.. again it was the same bozo shyt from Game 1 in sac..
Stop falling for that old narrative.. to say oh we took 50 threes is basically to imply we didn’t take it too the basket not once.. which is disingenuous
What about all the calls away from the ball? They let that shyt go when the lakers was fouling us away from the ball but repeatedly calling fouls on us for the same shyt.. again it was the same bozo shyt from Game 1 in sac..
the only thing Kerr can do decent is make an adjustment after a loss, but the problem is the whatever he does the Lakers still aren’t going to guard Draymond.
If he’s going to be out there doing nothing on offense and getting victimized by AD, might as well sit him on the bench
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.