The Amazing Spider-Man 2

Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
34,664
Reputation
9,668
Daps
105,686
Reppin
NULL
Hated the 1st one, but this shyt looks better than I expected.


That's a pretty dope Spider-Man trailer right there:ehh:
 

Type Username Here

Not a new member
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
16,368
Reputation
2,385
Daps
32,643
Reppin
humans
james-brown-crying-o.gif
 

Panther

Byrdgang
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
20,420
Reputation
3,585
Daps
38,681
Reppin
ByrdGang
The 1st was just ok imo. But this looks like it will be better. Jamie looks like hes gonna be a beast tho :ld:
 

Jazzy B.

Superstar
Joined
Aug 8, 2013
Messages
16,673
Reputation
2,727
Daps
60,287
Spider-Man 3 was always supposed to have three villains, those being Lizard, James Franco's New Goblin, and Sand-Man. The reason t didn't work is because Sony literally FORCED Sam Raimi to include Venom instead of Lizard. Raimi was never a fan of Venom

Nah the main villains were originally supposed to be Sandman, Vulture and Harry. Sandman and Vulture would be cellmates and Sandman would escape prison, get his powers end up breaking the vulture out who would manipulate him into helping get revenge on Spiderman who put him in jail and caused him to lose his company. Harry would still do his thing. None of the symbiote stuff was meant to be in the movie.

They forced Raimi to put the whole symbiote stuff and venom in when the film was already in production :snoop:, so Raimi then just gave no fukks, should have just left the man to do his thing after he had produced to good spiderman movies beforehand.
 
Top