The Amazing Spider-Man 2

HipHopStan

Top 113 Poster
Joined
Mar 29, 2013
Messages
17,177
Reputation
4,684
Daps
64,117
Reppin
I LIVE IN A CARDBOARD BOX!
There was to much shyt in 3. If they had cut some story - it would've been a passable film. Sam Riami wanted Sandman, Sony and the fans wanted Venom, and they teased Goblin at the end of Spiderman 2 so they had to do something with that. Personally...I would've cut Sandman, but that's just me. :yeshrug:

EDIT - Oh yeah. They cast Topher Grace as Venom. Who cleared that shyt? :comeon:
 
Last edited:

Heat

Member
Joined
May 12, 2012
Messages
324
Reputation
20
Daps
119
Reppin
Heart of the city
There was to much shyt in 3. If they had cut some story - it would've been a passable film. Sam Riami wanted Sandman, Sony and the fans wanted Venom, and they teased Goblin at the end of Spiderman 2 so they had to do something with that. Personally...I would've cut Sandman, but that's just me. :yeshrug:

Sandman is a horrible villain he's pretty awful
 

Human Torch

Byrd Gang 🦅
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
9,254
Reputation
1,641
Daps
31,355
Reppin
Philly born. PG raised
Wasnt a fan of the first one. But i'll definitely check this one out.

Something about this reboot just doesnt stick with me. Its nothing else, the first trilogy got the casting perfect to me. Tobey was Peter Parker. Kirsten Dunst(:huhldup:) was Mary Jane. And Franco was exactly how i pictured Harry and his dad Norman.

None of the people casted in this reboot give me that feeling. I dont see peter parker when I look at Garfield. Im the only one?
 
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
65,501
Reputation
28,482
Daps
390,479
Reppin
Ft. Stewart, Ga
Was the worst of the 3

Spider-Man 3 was always supposed to have three villains, those being Lizard, James Franco's New Goblin, and Sand-Man. The reason t didn't work is because Sony literally FORCED Sam Raimi to include Venom instead of Lizard. Raimi was never a fan of Venom
 
Top