You dont know how this goes because this is uncharted territory. You’re just hoping for the best lol.
The main unknown is how fast (if ever) we get to said point where a team can be replaced with an “Manager of AI system”, because there are still issues with AI hallucination, companies locking down data available to the world which hinders this current stage of Gen AI, etc.
You don't know how this goes either, which is funny.
Many A.I experts from Stanford, M.I.T, Caltech, etc. also seem to think if we ever get A.I that can do and think how humans do it's still far down the road anyways.
The realistic estimate is 30-50 years, if it even happens. Timestamped:
Everyone telling cats not to pursue Tech/Comp Sci/software for something that is potentially decades away is crazy.
Just like 15 years ago when people said QA will be gone to automation because engineers will be doing their own QA. Remember when Microsoft fired their entire QA department because of that 11 years ago? shyt was doom and gloom.
However, here we are in 2024 and someone with 5 years of QA experience/Sr. QA is getting paid $400k/year
right now. I hope nobody listened to that noise and discouragement 10 years ago, because they left generational wealth on the table. I know I'm not (and I'm not even QA).
It's like when people said degrees are useless if you want to be a leader, but 88% of all CEO's have a degree close to what they're doing including nearly 100% of S&P 500 CEO's. People literally dropped out of school after hearing that advice when they had an opportunity to finish and now it's too late for their current situations. I imagine many people are just looking for an excuse to quit anyways though, which will always be the case - then they'll try and take everyone else down with them. Tale as old as college.
Doom posters are hilarious, especially in an industry like tech where you have some of the brightest and most innovative humans on the planet working.