Team USA women soccer captain says $60 mil cash prize not fair. Men get $440 mil

broller

Veteran
Joined
Jan 25, 2016
Messages
25,619
Reputation
2,415
Daps
73,381
I was thinking about this why.do people.watch sports.
For entertainment right.
Womens tennis oftentimes gets higher ratings and i think women's soccer's is a huge draw.
They should get equal pay

you're wrong, relatively speaking.
 

broller

Veteran
Joined
Jan 25, 2016
Messages
25,619
Reputation
2,415
Daps
73,381
At the end of the day, you get what you can command. That's why I can't hate on cats that get, imo, overpaid. Get that money. The USNWT is clearly superior to its Mens counterpart. But the Women's World Cup as a whole pales to the Men's World Cup in popularity, views, and money accrued. The women deserve more but the economics of it might not match up. It's on them to demand more or hold out until they can get it

The women already get a higher % of the revenue from their World Cup than the men get from their World Cup. And I'm not comparing US women to US men, I'm talking about the overall pot available to all of the women's teams compared to the men's teams.
 

ShenJingPoQi

All Star
Joined
Oct 31, 2014
Messages
2,853
Reputation
-1,560
Daps
8,661
I was thinking about this why.do people.watch sports.
For entertainment right.
Womens tennis oftentimes gets higher ratings and i think women's soccer's is a huge draw.
They should get equal pay
Is that true? Evidence? Error riddle women tennis wouldn’t struggle to survive without being paired with men tennis
 

kovi

All Star
Joined
Aug 11, 2017
Messages
1,587
Reputation
-320
Daps
5,649
Both are a wallet hole to avoid a PR nightmare...

FIFA does not need a women's world cup and they're lucky to break even but they don't care because this tournament is purely staged for PR purposes...

Bottomline is all these women bytching about their pay not being equal to their male counterparts need to learn basic sports economics...

If you want to improve your pay, improve your fanbase/viewership...

Whether they need it or not is irrelevant if they’re profitable.
 

TheGreatShowtime

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
51,218
Reputation
12,103
Daps
239,152
Reppin
The Swamp
bj5tkEw.jpg
 

Contrefaire

Superstar
Joined
Oct 31, 2017
Messages
4,230
Reputation
1,480
Daps
19,504
Reppin
West Coast
i do think the women should get a bigger payout though. Doesn't have to be as much as the men but the gap should be closer. I'd like to assume the women's world cup is generating some decent money.....don't know for sure though

This is pretty much where I'm at on the topic. They're dominating the field, bringing home title after title and they have a lot of public interest. They don't have to be paid as much as the men, but they definitely need a substantial pay bump. Their games now generate MORE revenue than the men's team, yet there's still a huge pay gap.

And this is not just about FIFA or the WC prize. Their lawsuit against the U.S. Soccer Federation (which I think some people are lumping in with this new complaint) notes that them getting paid that much less actually affects their overall gameplay and training, coaching, etc. But even with all that, they play AND WIN more games than the men's team, have won multiple world championship titles and Olympic gold medals. They're bringing in money, international acclaim and they're viewed by the (soccer) world as THAT team. Just pay them already.
 
Joined
Dec 19, 2017
Messages
14,904
Reputation
3,982
Daps
59,794
Women should get paid like the dudes.

USMNT is garbage and the women win trophies. Sorry, IDGAF about "competition"...US women get everyone's best shot and keep on trucking. US men have almost no pressure and still suck.
 
Joined
Dec 19, 2017
Messages
14,904
Reputation
3,982
Daps
59,794
This is how I look at it.

Imagine you run a boxing "league" with different weight classes and tons fighters.

The most successful fighter is a featherweight but the biggest draw is a heavyweight that loses half of his fights.

The heavyweight gets a bigger purse in this "league" but the featherweight is champ of his division. Sure the heavyweight would kill the featherweight but I can understand the featherweight wanting a bigger share of the pie.

The women don't have as many avenues to make money so it's a double whammy. If the US women sucked, there'd be no argument....but the US women are #1 and the men just got beat by El Tri again.
 

Rell Lauren

Banned
Joined
Nov 30, 2016
Messages
29,000
Reputation
-2,888
Daps
111,793
Reppin
NYC
This is how I look at it.

Imagine you run a boxing "league" with different weight classes and tons fighters.

The most successful fighter is a featherweight but the biggest draw is a heavyweight that loses half of his fights.

The heavyweight gets a bigger purse in this "league" but the featherweight is champ of his division. Sure the heavyweight would kill the featherweight but I can understand the featherweight wanting a bigger share of the pie.

The women don't have as many avenues to make money so it's a double whammy. If the US women sucked, there'd be no argument....but the US women are #1 and the men just got beat by El Tri again.

And you're wrong again. The current CBA has USSF paying the women salaries and benefits in addition to subsidizing the failing NWSL. The women are trying to break the agreement.
 

Cyber

All Star
Supporter
Joined
Dec 18, 2014
Messages
1,023
Reputation
390
Daps
3,988
Reppin
Tennessee
not the same thing.....mens team is working from behind with the rest of the world thats been taking soccer seriously for a million years. Women's squad came about around the same time womens squads around the world developed. US Women had a soccer team before even Brazil did.
This, don't know why people don't understand this when mocking the Men's team. Obviously the Women's team is relatively better, but their competition is nowhere near comparable

Our best male athletes are pursuing football, basketball, baseball, maybe even Hockey and top individual sports before considering Soccer. Soccer is the main sport for our female athletes

For the sake of perspective, one of the reasons why a country of 5 million (New Zealand) is so fukking dominant at Rugby is because that's literally where their best athletes go. Every other elite Rugby playing nation has at least one other sport (some even have 2 or 3, like Australia) before their best athletes consider Rugby and it's why despite having significantly more people they're not faring as well when going against the All-Blacks
 
Top