Tariq Nasheed vs Fresh n Fit n Tommy

Slimkid07

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Aug 13, 2013
Messages
6,192
Reputation
1,794
Daps
26,357
I would have never had Tommy Sotomayor and Tariq being on the same page on my 2024 bingo card. :russ:

This was a fukking disaster for Myron, Sneako and the crew. Tariq eradicated them.

:mjlol: @ Fresh trying to be a moderator with his Porky Pig talking ass
Edit: That brotha that knocked Sneako's tooth out needs a GoFundme. I hate this fukker.
 
Last edited:

K.O.N.Y

Superstar
Joined
Sep 25, 2012
Messages
10,977
Reputation
2,369
Daps
37,711
Reppin
NEW YORK CITY
He wasn’t clear at all. He starting Juelzing and all the hairline jokes stopped when the Jews were brought up.

And he tried to say that Jews are white so I didn’t need to specifically call them out. Then Tommy said “if we’re supposed delineate between Africans and FBA, why shouldn’t we delineate between Jews and whites?” :sas2:

Tariq avoided that question and changed the subject with the quickness. Looks like we found Tariq’s Achilles heel. :sas1:
um no

he was pretty clear that jews operate as WHITE and work hand in hand with other whites

so there is no point in "delineating" them :beli:
 

HandyWithTheSteel

Superstar
Joined
Jan 26, 2017
Messages
3,813
Reputation
-1,233
Daps
30,860
um no

he was pretty clear that jews operate as WHITE and work hand in hand with other whites

so there is no point in "delineating" them :beli:
And Africans operate as black so there’s no need to delineate Africans from FBA, right Tariq?:ehh:
 

K.O.N.Y

Superstar
Joined
Sep 25, 2012
Messages
10,977
Reputation
2,369
Daps
37,711
Reppin
NEW YORK CITY
And Africans operate as black so there’s no need to delineate Africans from FBA, right Tariq?:ehh:
Are we even sure about that?

the whole point, is there is no specific JEWISH brand of white supramacy. They wanted him to act as if there was. Its just white supramacy lol

for black americans theres no need to make a distinction just to satisfy and crash out on there own anti jew agenda
 

CoryMack

Superstar
Joined
Aug 9, 2013
Messages
10,228
Reputation
1,807
Daps
37,354
There is no such thing as some special white ethnic "jew". There are Polish Jews, and Russian Jews, and Ukrainian Jews, and African Jews and Hungarian Jews and American Jews. Just like there are Russian Muslims, and American Muslims and Chinese Muslims and African Muslims.

If any of you have ever read H.G. Wells 'The Outline of History Vol 1 & 2' he explains who the special class of so called "jews" are: relatively recent converts from eastern europe who were converted by the sephardic jews from Spain. The sephardic jews got the religion from the Hebrews in North Africa. A group of them left and went to Spain when it was being conquered by outside invaders. And that religion was practiced by the Kushytes. Basically monotheism.

Dr. Clarke said they left North Africa due to the religious and social changes the outsiders were making. That's it in a nutshell. There isn't anything special about those people other than they've come into possession of ancient texts and other documents from antiquity that others don't have access to. Dr. Clarke also said that he was given a special concession to tour the basement of I believe it was either the Louvre in France or the British Museum in London and he said there's enough artifacts and documents down there to completely rewrite the history we've all been taught. And he said they'll most likely stay down in the basement.

You don't have to be a genius to understand what he meant by that.

The "jews" of today are primarily eastern european crakkkas who've made themselves the authority on who's a true jew and who isn't. The jews hold the power today so of course they can present themselves as the authority, but that doesn't mean what they're saying is correct. But Tariq is correct in saying there isn't any need to differentiate them from the anglo-saxon crakkka because they're all white and pushing the same thing. You see there's a war going on between whites too, so while the differences may matter to them they're really inconsequential to us.

I will say this though, and this is true anywhere in the world, wherever you find an anti-Black policy you'll find it originated with a so called jew. Saying the jews were "major contributors to the Civil Rights Movement" takes away from the fact that it was also jews who first authored the anti-Black policies that made a Civil Rights Movement necessary in the first place. No different than in the entertainment industry where, once you call them out for promoting negative and exploitative images of Black people, while themselves profiting and robbing Black artists at the same time through their contracts, they'll counter that if it wasn't for them Blacks wouldn't have been able to break into entertainment, etc. But when you dig deep enough you'll find that it was almost always a jew who was responsible for all the discriminatory practices that made our "friend" the "liberal jew" necessary in the first place.

I'll say this also, I have read Mein Kampf and Tariq was wrong there. The Nazi's war with the jews then was for the same things you see them doing in this country today. They had destroyed the German economy, were using the press to spread lies, offshored their heavy industry (deindustrialization), were responsible for all types of degeneracy and filth in society ( the same porn and shyt we have today) as well as a number of other things that tear societies apart. Racially, as far as we're concerned, he said it was the jews who were bringing Black people into German lands to fukk German women and create a buncha mixed breeds. The Germans war against the jews was some white on white shyt that we had nothing to do with other than being used as pawns by the jews.
 
Top