Am I the only person tired of folks asking this Dumb-ass question??!!
Why DA fukk would WB (or Marvel Studios) use TV actors for their Blockbuster film franchise??!!
Look at the actors on "Arrow", "Agents of ...", "The Flash", " Gotham", & etc.
How many of those actors would still have been casted in those same roles if they had decided to do a movie equivalent instead?
How is it a dumb ass question? Its all a matter of opinion... some prefer everything not to be connected and some do
Of course the casting for some stuff is questionable... but maybe its just me, but I'd prefer Stephen Amell and Grant Gustin to be featured in the films too
And since this Batman is already established, it'd be dope if GOTHAM was the prequel for this Batman
I haven't seen 1 episode of Supergirl to really judge it so I can't comment on it yet, but I was thinking that they were gonna keep all mentions of Batman/Superman off of television.... maybe a easter egg here and there but Superman obviously exists in this Supergirl universe
Idk.. just wishful thinking spewed onto a forum post
I see nothing wrong with me and others wondering why there isn't more continuity just as I see nothing wrong with why people want to keep them separate
and to argue the last thing you said, I'm pretty sure Daredevil, Luke Cage, etc will show up in those Infinity War movies and they're casted for Netflix shows that are still in continuity.. could you see them still being casted if they weren't Netflix shows?
And do you think they need blockbuster actors to play Green Arrow, the Flash, etc? The guy they casted for Cyborg in the FILMS hasn't even acted in 1 movie yet