You don't know what was on his ballot
Again you are making all this up, you have no idea what was on his voting ballot.
It's very ok NOT to vote, if you have nothing to vote for.
Like what specifically on his ballot?
Props to
@Optimus Prime for posting this (on page 2)
Assuming he lives in San Fran, there was 24 measures up for vote and a few of them are directly related to what he said he was going to do in the community...
Election 2016: Latest results on state, local, federal races
Housing upgrades
Yes: 75.9%No: 24.1%
597 / 597 precincts reporting
Amends existing $250 million bond loan program for seismic upgrades, to include loans for the acquisition and development of affordable housing.
Requires two-thirds vote.
Youth vote
Yes: 47.3%No: 52.7%
597 / 597 precincts reporting
Allows 16- and 17-year-olds to vote in municipal elections.
Police oversight
Yes: 79.8%No: 20.2%
597 / 597 precincts reporting
Transforms the Office of Citizen Complaints into the Department of Police Accountability, which would conduct reviews of how the Police Department and Police Commission handle allegations of officer misconduct.
Neighborhood crime unit
Yes: 45.5%No: 54.5%
597 / 597 precincts reporting
Requires the creation of a neighborhood crime unit in the Police Department.
Affordable housing
Yes: 35.1%No: 64.9%
597 / 597 precincts reporting
Raises maximum income level for qualifying for subsidized affordable housing.
Transfer tax
Yes: 61.9%No: 38.1%
597 / 597 precincts reporting
Increases transfer taxes on higher-value properties. Backers want to use money to pay for free community college and street trees.
Superior Court Judge, office 7
PLUS California had legalizing weed up to vote
You telling me none of those issues were worth his vote?
this is true, but how much say do the people have in what goes on their ballots or the legislature that even gets brought to a ballot?
besides the issues your politicians have chosen and designed to their will, how much say do the people have? you only see 1% of the end game on that ballot.
politicians will have an empty town hall meeting to get the opinions of old people on gentrifying their neighborhood, make promises to get votes and then sell them off for the highest bidder. thats just one example of how little impact people actually have in their neighborhoods and on these legislations. maybe he has a problem with that. maybe he aint fukkin with that.
You make your issues known to the elected officials who represent your community. They then work in a city/district/state level to get those issues addressed. I totally understand you & others who are frustrated with the system but that's how change begins on a local level.
I don't expect white folks or the system to change and history has shown that it wont. that's the difference between our positions. You have faith in them and the system. I do not. Colin does not. We are still talking about the same issues we been voting on for 50+ years. They have let you know repeatedly they don't think your life matters.. It's about time you believe them.
Again there are more than just politicians on the ballot. Are you against voting for changes that would directly impact our community like the ones I posted that Colin could have voted on? Colin is a hypocrite for this one breh