Stephen A questions why Kamala won't do interviews

the bossman

Superstar
Joined
Sep 4, 2012
Messages
10,544
Reputation
2,267
Daps
49,220
Reppin
Norfeast D.C.
A debate is not an interview
she hasn't needed to do an interview. Engaging directly with voters has been working with resounding success. delivering a message on her policies tomorrow, followed by DNC next week, then a debate few weeks after that. Her momentum is strong.

Please explain how not doing an interview right now is hurting her campaign?

It's not.

And I suspect once she eventually does interviews it'll probably be with some small local outlets instead of the bigwigs just fishing for weak gotcha soundbites.
 

Arizax2

All Star
Joined
Mar 20, 2017
Messages
3,049
Reputation
326
Daps
9,500
It's working for her and low key Waltz is picking up all the headlines on the dem side. This strategy is working. Let him be the face of the campaign all the way up to the convention then it's gona be Harris to wrap up the rest. Is it the right thing to do for someone running for the highest office, No but it's working.
 

Damnshow

Veteran
Joined
Mar 10, 2014
Messages
17,556
Reputation
4,528
Daps
77,142
Why is Stephen A. talking about politics? Is he pretending to be expert on everything?

What exact interviews does he want? The ones where she has to argue with MAGA media? :mjlol: There's a simple rule: don't argue with fools because they will eventually drag you down to their level and crush you with their experience. All MAGA does is play whataboutism. Right now when there's no interview, they looking hella desperate. Trump standing out there alone and yelling at clouds like an old man.

In no well developed country does politicial parties with some sort of reputation come to conspiracy driven shows to argue. Kamala is busy touring because they should have let Biden step away much sooner than that. They got a lot of things to do in a short time.
 

that guy

Superstar
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
5,231
Reputation
548
Daps
17,024
Most of Donald Trumps interviews are easy glaze fests lol he typically doesn't sit down with contentious interviews.

A debate however is fundamentally the ultimate form of having to defend your stances in real time to an intentionally hostile force. That will try and undermine anything you say. Far more of a litmus test than an interview.

This is essentially basic sociology

We already know Kamala has a better temperment than Trump in casual conversation. If that's a "question" to you, then you have terrible character judgment lol
Why do you keep bringing up Donald trump when we’re talking about Kamala :dahell:

You should be capable of defending your position for Kamala without bringing up any other candidate. Having to resort to trump whataboutism every other sentence isn’t a good look.

A debate however is fundamentally the ultimate form of having to defend your stances in real time to an intentionally hostile force.
I already explained to you why an objective interview is better than a debate. You clearly didn’t learn anything.

We want to hear Kamala explain in-depth her positions, not debate sound-bites. We don’t want filibustering and non-answers to questions from a question dodger like Kamala.

This is essentially basic sociology
Um no, this is basic political science or communication. Sociology :mjlol:
I told you already, stop trying to sound smart.

We already know Kamala has a better temperment than Trump in casual conversation. If that's a "question" to you, then you have terrible character judgment lol
Here you are again reverting trump whataboutism. Please don’t bring up character judgement when your only barometer for Kamala is “at least she’s not trump”
 

that guy

Superstar
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
5,231
Reputation
548
Daps
17,024
she hasn't needed to do an interview. Engaging directly with voters has been working with resounding success. delivering a message on her policies tomorrow, followed by DNC next week, then a debate few weeks after that. Her momentum is strong.

Please explain how not doing an interview right now is hurting her campaign?

It's not.

And I suspect once she eventually does interviews it'll probably be with some small local outlets instead of the bigwigs just fishing for weak gotcha soundbites.
you mean like the debate she's already agreed to do next month?
First you said she’s doing an interview by doing a debate. Now you’re saying she doesn’t need to do interviews.

You’re right that she doesn’t need to do interviews. It’s not like her voters care about policy and her last campaign failed miserably in part due to her terrible interview responses.
 

that guy

Superstar
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
5,231
Reputation
548
Daps
17,024
She's been in the film room for 4 years and she's also a former prosecutor. There's not a lot of questions that are going to trip her up. She's also been outlining their first 100 days agenda in recent days, meaning that she will have answers for the most pressing questions that Americans care about. They have a platform now and she's prepared.

Which by the way.... Trump/Vance have no platform at all other than "Project 2025" which they cannot address because it's insanely unpopular. So instead, he holds these press conferences, rambles and puts his foot in his mouth each and every time about serious issues....
That’s not what happened during her last campaign. And the fact that she doesn’t want to do interviews this time around shows that she’s trying to avoid repeating the same mistakes.
 

that guy

Superstar
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
5,231
Reputation
548
Daps
17,024
It's working for her and low key Waltz is picking up all the headlines on the dem side. This strategy is working. Let him be the face of the campaign all the way up to the convention then it's gona be Harris to wrap up the rest. Is it the right thing to do for someone running for the highest office, No but it's working.
America is cooked :dead:
 

Scaaar

Superstar
Joined
Mar 19, 2017
Messages
3,263
Reputation
542
Daps
13,065
She's not giving interviews for three reasons:

1. She doesn't have an agenda outside typical Democratic talking points.

2. It worked for Joe in 2020. Folks already forgotten he really didn't campaign much.

3. Given what's going on this the middle east, she doesn't want to comment on Israel considering Biden is still sending them weapons.

Folks just need to call shyt like it is. :manny:
You know in 2020 COVID quarantine was still in effect in alot of cities....I truly believe people just say stuff on here because they think it sounds good
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
51,791
Reputation
7,926
Daps
148,631
Why do you keep bringing up Donald trump when we’re talking about Kamala :dahell:

You should be capable of defending your position for Kamala without bringing up any other candidate. Having to resort to trump whataboutism every other sentence isn’t a good look.


I already explained to you why an objective interview is better than a debate. You clearly didn’t learn anything.

We want to hear Kamala explain in-depth her positions, not debate sound-bites. We don’t want filibustering and non-answers to questions from a question dodger like Kamala.


Um no, this is basic political science or communication. Sociology :mjlol:
I told you already, stop trying to sound smart.


Here you are again reverting trump whataboutism. Please don’t bring up character judgement when your only barometer for Kamala is “at least she’s not trump”


1/1
Question: do you think the federal government should set food price?

As God is my witness, his answer was: she’s against fracking


To post tweets in this format, more info here: https://www.thecoli.com/threads/tips-and-tricks-for-posting-the-coli-megathread.984734/post-52211196



1/1
Trump was just asked a question about "food prices" and he responded with a rant about fracking. He doesn't have any idea what's going on – at all.


To post tweets in this format, more info here: https://www.thecoli.com/threads/tips-and-tricks-for-posting-the-coli-megathread.984734/post-52211196
 
Last edited:
Top