They are ready to attack that IGN reviewer in real life on the Starfield redditReviewers are going to need internet security after some of these scores.
This is a lie,To quote @ORDER_66 its #bothsides with this. Sony stans was mad they don't got starfield and Xbox stans were reveling too much in one game and trying to exclaim praise for their first shot at a good exclusive in years calling it game of the generation
Idk man I'm just basing it off what I'm seeing. I wasn't even really in this thread like this was too busy playing baldurs gate 3This is a lie,
As usual it’s sony goofballs on both sides arguing with themselves.
Over the last couple weeks we’ve had about a half dozen threads made about the game ZERO of them were made by xbox stan’s trying to hype up the game.
In this thread @Gizmo_Duck @ORDER_66 @Rekkapryde and @EzekelRAGE have like double the posts of all posters COMBINED.
This is that goofy shyt where some of you take the xbox game and create your own standards so an 88 can be somehow “disappointing” While spider-man at 84 is the greatest shyt in gaming.
Sony stan’s wild
You would have been here doing the same thing if it was rated 95+.Millions of grown men acting a damn fool over a video game
Check who’s been talking about the game the most,Idk man I'm just basing it off what I'm seeing. I wasn't even really in this thread like this was too busy playing baldurs gate 3
No, this is just projection from you weirdos.You would have been here doing the same thing if it was rated 95+.
It'll be ok, most of us ares still excited for the game.
Outer Worlds was criminally short. But man was that a fun ride.
ACG doesn't generally have bias like that. I think some of these outlets wanted Starfield to fail. Bet they still playing it too.He seemed to love it but gameranx and IGN didn’t seem all that impressed
As I mentioned a few pages back, it seems like the reviewers might not be entirely impartial. They were hoping for a game akin to No Man's Sky, focused on space exploration, but for those not into that, No Man's Sky can be pretty dull.
These reviewers tend to show a bias towards specific game types. Anything with a hint of nostalgia can easily score an 8, even with 8-bit graphics. However, if a game aims for a modern look, they scrutinize it mercilessly, especially when there are graphical hiccups or frame rate issues.
It's puzzling that the IGN reviewer gave Fallout and Cyberpunk a 9, but Starfield, which is even bigger and less buggy, only managed a 7. It makes you wonder, if it had seamless transitions without load screens, would it have earned that elusive 9? SMH.
They down bad I understand it . They wanted starfield to fail badly it didn't it hurts themThis is a lie,
As usual it’s sony goofballs on both sides arguing with themselves.
Over the last couple weeks we’ve had about a half dozen threads made about the game ZERO of them were made by xbox stan’s trying to hype up the game.
In this thread @Gizmo_Duck @ORDER_66 @Rekkapryde and @EzekelRAGE have like double the posts of all posters COMBINED.
This is that goofy shyt where some of you take the xbox game and create your own standards so an 88 can be somehow “disappointing” While spider-man at 84 is the greatest shyt in gaming.
Sony stan’s wild
How is us clowning on starfield projection? There's nothing to project.No, this is just projection from you weirdos.
He seemed to love it but gameranx and IGN didn’t seem all that impressed
As I mentioned a few pages back, it seems like the reviewers might not be entirely impartial. They were hoping for a game akin to No Man's Sky, focused on space exploration, but for those not into that, No Man's Sky can be pretty dull.
These reviewers tend to show a bias towards specific game types. Anything with a hint of nostalgia can easily score an 8, even with 8-bit graphics. However, if a game aims for a modern look, they scrutinize it mercilessly, especially when there are graphical hiccups or frame rate issues.
It's puzzling that the IGN reviewer gave Fallout and Cyberpunk a 9, but Starfield, which is even bigger and less buggy, only managed a 7. It makes you wonder, if it had seamless transitions without load screens, would it have earned that elusive 9? SMH.
These scores prove the point I was trying to make. IGN and gamespot’s reviews are disrespectful. I think the people like ACG along with some of the small time reviewers are far better gage of how good this game is. I meant to say MY opinion and most gamers will think the game is 88-95 but the big companies will pick it apart which they are doing.