What the fukk are yall arguing in a starfield thread?
Who gives a fukk
What the fukk are yall arguing in a starfield thread?
Who gives a fukk
Tell me when I'm telling lies
It isn't about distribution of resources to the more 'popular' system.
BG3 Director said:we don't have infinite resources. That means we can't do everything at once
Right now, the whole focus is obviously on the PC and PS5 versions that are coming out.
By that logic - HE'S A MILLIONAIRE! - why even own multiple Series X's when he can own multiple 4090 PC's?
Maaaybe he has an S in his house because he isn't just developing the game for one console and maaaybe he's just doing his job by also playing the game on the Series S.
Now get the fukk out the thread! You ain't team xbox and you ain't GameGame you don't belong here!!
Yeah... because the S splitscreen issue was an untenable situation before release. If you think they went into development 'let's launch on Sony first!' when this game entered EA before any of the new consoles dropped, you're a fool.
Hey man, i’m not even reading all of this.Yeah... because the S splitscreen issue was an untenable situation before release. If you think they went into development 'let's launch on Sony first!' when this game entered EA before any of the new consoles dropped, you're a fool.
They hit a wall on the technical side with the S because of the platform parity mandate, and instead of sitting there ramming into it, swerved and moved forward with the path of least resistance.
Y'all want to be the underserved, oppressed party so bad with devs going out of their way to skip you. Because you can't accept that it is bad Xbox brass decisionmaking that is preventing that.
Larian ain't want to drop their game staggered to this degree, you nincompoop. Circumstances required it. Circumstances surrounded the Series fukking S. Note the complete dearth of statements saying there were design issues for the X. There are none. Because nothing precludes that system from running the mechanics the game requires.
fukking idiocy It's like you have an aversion to basic reading comprehension and will twist and mold a sentence into meaning what you think it means devoid of context.
And you keep bringing this all back when; again. We tryna talk about Starfield again finally. But you just can't take your L in peace.
I figured you'd be used to them by this point, jesus.
why do you waste your braincells on Meach?So would you say the Series S forcing a game tied with Tears of the Kingdom as the best reviewed game of the year with a 96 score on Metacritic to be a timed console exclusive for the PS5 is a win for Xbox?
That extra time the Series S required cost them a GOTY candidate this year.
so...Hey man, i’m not even reading all of this.
fukking idiocy It's like you have an aversion to basic reading comprehension
These all the same folks trying to crucify Sony for "timed exclusives".
Now it's "We don't mind getting the game later, it's a win for the series S!"
Quit making shyt up. This is a quote from the Larian CEO.Hey man, i’m not even reading all of this.
We literally have direct statements from Larian with regard to the series S release.
Whatever you’ve made up in your head is just tales from your ass at this point
Larian says “series s isn’t a hinderance we just gotta optimize and we prioritized other platforms first”
@Novembruh says “Larian don’t know what optimization is, shytbox s is trash”
you claiming disappointed neutrality but cheering on one side
Quit making shyt up. This is a quote from the Larian CEO.
"Vincke also likened developing for the Xbox Series S to developing for the Nintendo Switch and minimum spec PCs. Unlike consoles, PC gaming isn't a homogenised singular platform--everyone has their own build with its own hardware. You might have a top-of-the-line graphics card that set you back thousands of pounds, or something from two years ago that still holds up okay. Porting to a PC typically means casting a wide net, implementing plenty of graphical options to let people find what works for them. The Switch meanwhile is the weakest of all 'current-gen' consoles, but Larian Studios did get Divininity: Original Sin 2 to work on the platform. It just took a little longer. Xbox Series S is in the same boat."
Baldur's Gate 3 Lead Says Xbox Series S Isn't Holding Back Current-Gen
Swen Vincke likened developing for the Xbox Series S to minimum spec PCs and the Nintendo Switch.www.thegamer.com
Bruh, he compared it to a Switch and low end PCs. Folks can get Doom to play on TI-86, does that mean it's good?See, this is an example. This nikka is quoting the CEO when the nikkas he quoting posted something from this same exact interview where he says the S isn't holding back development and he literally says the series s is "perfectly fine."
“Xbox series S just needs more optimization like lower end PC and switch”Quit making shyt up. This is a quote from the Larian CEO.
"Vincke also likened developing for the Xbox Series S to developing for the Nintendo Switch and minimum spec PCs. Unlike consoles, PC gaming isn't a homogenised singular platform--everyone has their own build with its own hardware. You might have a top-of-the-line graphics card that set you back thousands of pounds, or something from two years ago that still holds up okay. Porting to a PC typically means casting a wide net, implementing plenty of graphical options to let people find what works for them. The Switch meanwhile is the weakest of all 'current-gen' consoles, but Larian Studios did get Divininity: Original Sin 2 to work on the platform. It just took a little longer. Xbox Series S is in the same boat."
Baldur's Gate 3 Lead Says Xbox Series S Isn't Holding Back Current-Gen
Swen Vincke likened developing for the Xbox Series S to minimum spec PCs and the Nintendo Switch.www.thegamer.com
Bruh, he compared it to a Switch and low end PCs. Folks can get Doom to play on TI-86, does that mean it's good?
Folks are looking for the best experience, and that would be Series X or PC.
Quit lying to these folks.