that was added by the twitter trolls. which is what they do. harvest and exploit these misunderstandings. which is the purpose of this thread.Cant speak on his podcast cause I havent seen it. I will go check out some episodes though. But from the clips posted in this thread I didnt get that overall sentiment at all that he felt he was better than anyone. He was just framing his response. And he very well could be c00ning in his podcast but from the clip with Van I dont see it.
And who has Van lathan ever challenged outside of Kanye and Acho? Does he even go at cacs? Have anybody on the level of Roger Godell or any prominent cac business leader even ever sat down to talk with Van Lathan? Its easy to talk and tell folks what to do when your on the sidelines and outside looking in. Van was always boot lickin and real quiet when he was around Harvey Levin on TMZ even when they would trash black folks.
take Van Lathan out of it...Emmanuel Acho still said some c00n shyt. And I posted what was on his website:
that's crystal clear as to what he means by no "sting". He wants white people to see him as a "safe space" to talk about their racism.
Old buddy is saying he's a better white person whisperer is not the hill you wanna die on breh.so we've heard... which begs the question why anyone is mad? that fool just cosigned a long held position here...
On Twitter everyone letting him have it collectively and that makes me smile
again, he's not just having dialogues with white people about race, he's saying that him not having "generational trauma" means white people like him better. he's trying to portray himself as a better version of a black man directly compared to black americans because he doesn't have the "sting" when he talks to white people. the implication is that black americans have some sort of duty to provide a "safe space" for white people in order for racism to end.In order to have any fruitful conversation you need to create a safe place to dialogue. Correct me if I'm wrong but is that not the purpose of the show? To actually have discussion? is the goal to just sh!t on cacs or is the goal to discuss racism?
Yea, Ocho is on some clown shyt. Saying that because he doesn't have slavery in his background he can more rationally deal with cacs free from bias.the context you're missing is that Emmanual Acho has a podcast called "Uncomfortable Conversations with a Black Man" when he calls himself discussing race with with white Americans. He portrays himself as some kind of more palatable version of a black man compared to black americans. So he sits around with white people easing THEIR minds about their racist views.
He wasn't just saying "I don't have the racial history black americans have so when i talk to white people it's doesn't have that context"...he's saying "white people like me more, and i want them to like me more, and i'm a better representative of blackness in america than multigenerational black americans". It's extremely c00nish.
Even if he didn't say it to Van Lathan, it's still c00nish.
from his website:Watch
uncomfortableconvos.com
exactly.Yea, Ocho is on some clown shyt. Saying that because he doesn't have slavery in his background he can more rationally deal with cacs free from bias.
Like, nikka what. Imagine ADOS went to Nigeria or the UK and said that because we didn't experience colonialism, we are better judges of the character and actions of Eurocacs and we could be better advocates because we are unbiased . Inagine going to the Congo and saying that dumb shyt to people whose family had members killed or maimed. Saying that we are better arbiters to to help the Congolese"bury the hatchet" with Leopold's ghost and that traumatic experience with colonialism clouded their judgement regarding Belgium cacs.