I remeber now. Your the dude that likes to call people stupid while saying stupid shyt. Just like last time I refuse to engage with you because you are incapable of having a decent conversation without hurling insults. Good day sir.
The German was more disturbed by slavery than Django. Yeah yeah Django was used to it but that doesnt mean it shouldn't bother him. Django was more concerned with his wife than the slaves he went out his way to shyt on slaves to appease Candy. If QT wanted to make a Black hero, Django would've at least empathize with the other slaves. He would've made Django inadvertently spark a slave revolt, throwing everything Candy said about slaves back in his face. Django would've gained his own freedom and he would've killed Candy. Instead we have a White man freeing Django and destroying the man who is the sole cause of Django's pain. The White man giveth and taketh.
That's your interperation going into the movie with those feelings about white/black relations. You'd feel that way about how white people feel about us with or without the movie. In my opinion the movie showed the ignorance and savagery of white folks, and the intelligence and strength of black folks. I didn't see any slave ignorance outside of the house nikka who acted just like a house nikka should. I have no problem in finding the humor in painful events, you might disagree, but I'd rather laugh at painful history than cry about it. How did the 2/3rds of the movie show how inferior black people are? Candy tried to prove it, but the events in the movie proved he was wrong. I saw intelligent black people beat ignorant white folks, and I saw black love conquer all. I saw a black couple ride off into the sunset as winners.The filled is film with jokes about slavery, and Blacks. The film begs the audience to laugh at slave ignorance and c00nery. It also wants us to laugh at how ridiculous those pale faces with hoods are...Asking us to find humor in a group that would go on to massacre, rape, oppress Blacks for the next 120 years.
A good 2/3 of the film is spent explaining why slaves are inferior to whites or are best compared to animals; even Django adopts this mentality under the German's request. I'm sure QT went through all the possible plot scenarios and found the mythical "mandingo fights" to suit his story the best but why not include some counter anti-slavery dialogue. I guess not even the slaves back then thought negroes were worth a damn in the head.
In reality, white racists believed Black men were violent creatures that needed to be controlled. If said negro wasn't controlled or was freed, White families were in danger, particularly white women. No only does Django fulfill our modern angry Black man archetype to a T (understandably), he goes on a killing spree. Once Django obtains his "reward", he continues this killing spree and even takes out an innocent white woman, the pale face on that farm who was nice to his girl.
QT tried to sell Django as a Black hero
And I could go on
The filled is film with jokes about slavery, and Blacks. The film begs the audience to laugh at slave ignorance and c00nery. It also wants us to laugh at how ridiculous those pale faces with hoods are...Asking us to find humor in a group that would go on to massacre, rape, oppress Blacks for the next 120 years.
A good 2/3 of the film is spent explaining why slaves are inferior to whites or are best compared to animals; even Django adopts this mentality under the German's request. I'm sure QT went through all the possible plot scenarios and found the mythical "mandingo fights" to suit his story the best but why not include some counter anti-slavery dialogue. I guess not even the slaves back then thought negroes were worth a damn in the head.
In reality, white racists believed Black men were violent creatures that needed to be controlled. If said negro wasn't controlled or was freed, White families were in danger, particularly white women. No only does Django fulfill our modern angry Black man archetype to a T (understandably), he goes on a killing spree. Once Django obtains his "reward", he continues this killing spree and even takes out an innocent white woman, the pale face on that farm who was nice to his girl.
QT tried to sell Django as a Black hero
And I could go on
dikk gregory the gawd
My interpretation? I'm giving a history lesson but I agreed. If I were ignorant of American/Black history I wouldn't have had a problem with how it portrayed race relationships. I wouldn't even talk bad about it (like Lincoln) if it werent for its soundtrack
and editing It kept taking me out the film. I dont mind dark/gallows humor, i prefer it but in doing that you exploit the source material; its impossible not to. Thats what I'm getting at. One minute Django takes a serious look at slavery and the next its jokes. It cant be both the entire time.
You didn't forget who I was, this is the same thread. I even called you a "boot-licker" in the other post that you quoted. Im not calling you these things just to insult, i think the adjectives ive used to describe tou are quite accurate. You're just coppong a plea because you dont have anything intelligent to say. Go wash your p*ssy sensitive Sally. BTW It's "you're" as in you are, not your.
Oh and your wrong about roots that was a totaly fictional story as well
The three "smartest" negroes in Django:
Broomhilda - learned German and literacy from her masters
Django & Uncle Sam- learned how to c00n from other whites
dikk gregory the gawd
one of my favorite books from highschool
You're selectively sensitive. You're just using the insults as a copout because you argument in this debate is bullshyt. Like I said, I insulted you in the post that you quoted to re-engage me.
