Just take a second and ask yourself what you're trying to accomplish? Are you trying to prove me wrong? If so, why? Who is your audience? Me? The people? Yourself?Where do you think they get there counts from Kodie? Quarterly sales Are you implying that quarterly sales don't reflect actual sales?
You lost me there bruh. I became aware of this one a story came out about it. I didn't come to that conslusion myself. Sony claimed they shipped 70mil, then 2months later it was 77mil which made ppl look into how they got to that number. Then it was DISCOVERED that sony has been combining ps2 and 3 sales as systems sold hence the false belief nowadays that the ps3 has shipped more units worldwide than xbox.
I've provided links showing you this, but it doesn't register for some reason. I can't tell you how long they been doing this, all I can tell you is they didn't JUST START or that would be known now wouldn't it.
Sony didn't tell anybody they was doing this, or the story about 77mil would of never been written THINNNNNNNNNNNNNNNK!!!!
Here's the story again so you can't confuse yourself...
PS3 passes Xbox 360 global shipment total for first time - Gaming News - Digital Spy
Now how did they come to the 70million number before the 77mil?
That is a good question. I've been asking that all gen, and nobody has been able to answer it. But if you wanna provide those Europeon numbers? That would be a start
Here, let me show you some Euro numbers
http://playstationer.net/2012/12/19/ps3-sales-hit-30-million-in-europe-and-pal-territories/
Of course you'd never see where those numbers come from, just that sony said it. But sony has a history of saying things now don't they.
You gonna ignore all that too, aren't cha
Its pretty obvious they lying. There would be no need to mislead unless they was lying. If you choose to play dumb here, go right ahead.
But they don't discuss numbers when they losing. When they was selling more, they wouldn't shut up about it. shyt, 30mil in Europe right?
No evidence anywhere, but thats good enough for you...
Yes, but that wasn't my intention. You make yourself out to be a dumbass because you discredited me ONLY because
Like if what I'm saying now isn't something I been saying for 6/7yrs now?
You seen my shyt come true inspite of the beliefs of "experts"
nikka, you tried to pass off what IDC says as trustworthy when I basically showed you how idiotic that is. The fact you couldn't just take that L is what makes you not an a$$hole. But a dumbass. I think you turned into one because I called you an idiot. I'm sorry for that, I don't truly think your an idiot. Just a dumbass (I kid)
Has sony proven there claim?
Has sony been caught lying about numbers?
Has sony tried to skew numbers?
If the answers is NO, Yes, Yes then what is left to discuss here?
Yea, yea they did. And IDC numbers mirror everything sony says after the fact
They also said sony would be dominating by now, and that wii-u will be be 50mil sold in 3yrs. I'm assuming you thought IDC was first with those numbers and thought you had a point
Wow kodie, you have reached a new low.
The link to my thread has information in it that answers your question in this thread
I got that 63mil number by adding up the quarterly reports over x-amount of time. But if you did that yourself, you'd get to the same conclusions. Then the reports on sony's yearly losses confirms what is being discussed. Didn't sony also claim they was making money on PS3's years ago?
Sony finally making money on PS3 hardware; no price cut in foreseeable future - SlashGear
Funny, cuz 2yrs later the exact same story resurfaces...
PS3 now makes money (as well as playing games) | PLAY Magazine
Pay attention. Nobody can give you a straight answer because these nikkaz keep lying about everything. Explain those last two links I just posted. Cuz if they selling systems at the rate you wanna believe (70mil) then this wouldn't be possible
PlayStation News: PlayStation division loses £1.8 billion as annual PS3 sales decline - ComputerAndVideoGames.com
^^^ Please read that link, its short ^^^
Then ask yourself, how can sony be neck and neck but losing so much?
Meanwhile, Microsoft is making money for years now even tho neck n neck means they should be losing like sony
But they not. Is 2+2 really that hard Kodie
You couldn't possibly be trying to prove something to me because it's very clear we come to very different conclusions with the same data. And you're not gonna get a message across by saying stuff like "you've hit a new low" and "so you don't confuse yourself". It makes you sound very emotional.
Listen, if your goal is to get me to see your side, just stop. Don't even waste your breath. You've said enough that I've made up my mind about how wrong you are on this subject. That's not to say you can't ever be right but you've gone this far saying Sony is lying and without providing what I personally see as proof. If that doesn't tell you how completely different our views are, I don't know what will. You think you're providing factual proof and I think you're not. Looking at it from a perspective that is neither mine, nor yours, what do you think will be the conclusion?