Obviously the quality of any particular album is subjective. I'll repeat though, just because you think that a particular album is amazing doesn't mean it's a classic. Classics are about more than your personal opinion, they're about the opinion of the masses. You didn't get the Pieces of a Man analogy? I think that Pieces of a Man is better than 50's GRODT, but GRODT is a classic and POM isn't. See how that works?
I'm telling you that impact is a big factor in what albums are and aren't classic. Impact or popularity isn't the end all be all, but an album isn't a classic unless people cared about it. Again, quality is subjective. So no, vol2 isn't better than RD just because it did better commercially. The impact of vol2 does make it a classic though. Regardless of what you personally feel about the quality of vol2, that album defines a specific time in hiphop. That album has songs that resonated with the masses. That album has classic records that still are being played today, 14 years later. That's how you define classics. I'll ask you again, what makes Lost Tapes a classic besides your personal opinion or the personal opinion of Nas fans?
Now I do.
nikkas always gotta' be so gotdamn condescending.
Let's be clear. You don't really know what the fukk you're talking about anymore than the next person who has a personal opinion on the topic.
You can't even come up with a coherent definition of "classic" to justify the shyt you're talking about. You're all over the place. And this is fine because, like I said, the subject is entirely subjective. Your criteria for grading albums won't completely be like mine. And that's because there is no objective criteria/standard for calling something a classic album.
To answer your question, though, I think Lost Tapes is a classic record because I think every song on that tape is fukking great. I can play it front to back any time. I love the nostalgic feel of the album--themes of despair, hopelessness, and living in the inner city abound. The production is great-- Alchemist, LES, Rockwilder, D-Dot, Pone and Toke, etc. laced him with some great music. The range of social themes and commentary is dope. Nas's perspective on life and sharing stories from his environment and experiences is provocative. Nas's rhyming, flow, and introspective lyricism is as sharp and enjoyable as on any album I've heard from him. More than anything, conceptually, I love that the record is a compilation of records that he recorded during different recording periods. Adds to the mystique of Nas, considering that these were "just leftover tracks." While some might argue that this makes the album less cohesive, I think it still works and depicts Nas's versatility as an artist (plus, it's nice to have mastered versions of songs). Also, I think this gives the album a different feel from what he usually releases. No singles. No features. No marketing schemes. No concern for selling records. Just Nas making great fukking music. It's my 2nd favorite Nas album next to illmatic.
Just my opinion.
For the record, MC Hammer's "Please Hammer, Don't Hurt Em" and Vanilla Ice's "To the Extreme" are NOT classics just because they were commercially popular.
Obviously the quality of any particular album is subjective. I'll repeat though, just because you think that a particular album is amazing doesn't mean it's a classic. Classics are about more than your personal opinion, they're about the opinion of the masses. You didn't get the Pieces of a Man analogy? I think that Pieces of a Man is better than 50's GRODT, but GRODT is a classic and POM isn't. See how that works?
I'm telling you that impact is a big factor in what albums are and aren't classic. Impact or popularity isn't the end all be all, but an album isn't a classic unless people cared about it. Again, quality is subjective. So no, vol2 isn't better than RD just because it did better commercially. The impact of vol2 does make it a classic though. Regardless of what you personally feel about the quality of vol2, that album defines a specific time in hiphop. That album has songs that resonated with the masses. That album has classic records that still are being played today, 14 years later. That's how you define classics. I'll ask you again, what makes Lost Tapes a classic besides your personal opinion or the personal opinion of Nas fans?
If people are nullifying Life Is Good from being classic based off Summer On Smash alone, then based off that reasoning, none of the following hip-hop albums are classic with that fukked up logic
The Black Album because of "Justify My Thug and "Change Clothes"
All Eyez On Me because of "What's Ya Phone Number"
The Blueprint because of "Jigga That nikka"
Life After Death because of "Another"
The College Dropout because of "Workout Plan"
Late Registration because of "Gold Digger"
How stupid does that sound
Nas dropped a classic and nikkas can't stand it.
Deal with it mufukkas
Now I do.
nikkas always gotta' be so gotdamn condescending. Wasn't being condescending, just trying to dumb down for you since you having a hard time comprehending.
Let's be clear. You don't really know what the fukk you're talking about anymore than the next person who has a personal opinion on the topic.
You can't even come up with a coherent definition of "classic" to justify the shyt you're talking about. You're all over the place. And this is fine because, like I said, the subject is entirely subjective. Your criteria for grading albums won't completely be like mine. And that's because there is no objective criteria/standard for calling something a classic album.What I do know is that there is a difference between personal favorites and classics. Im not all over the place and the definition that I have for classic albums is perfectly coherent. Classic albums are simply defined as albums that stand out, mark a period of time, and have made an impact on the game according to the hiphop masses. Thats a pretty objective standard. We can debate whether specific albums meet that standard, but the standard itself is objective. What you're saying is that there are no classics, only personal favorites.
To answer your question, though, I think Lost Tapes is a classic record because I think every song on that tape is fukking great. I can play it front to back any time. I love the nostalgic feel of the album--themes of despair, hopelessness, and living in the inner city abound. The production is great-- Alchemist, LES, Rockwilder, D-Dot, Pone and Toke, etc. laced him with some great music. The range of social themes and commentary is dope. Nas's perspective on life and sharing stories from his environment and experiences is provocative. Nas's rhyming, flow, and introspective lyricism is as sharp and enjoyable as on any album I've heard from him. More than anything, conceptually, I love that the record is a compilation of records that he recorded during different recording periods. Adds to the mystique of Nas, considering that these were "just leftover tracks." While some might argue that this makes the album less cohesive, I think it still works and depicts Nas's versatility as an artist (plus, it's nice to have mastered versions of songs). Also, I think this gives the album a different feel from what he usually releases. No singles. No features. No marketing schemes. No concern for selling records. Just Nas making great fukking music. It's my 2nd favorite Nas album next to illmatic.What question are you supposed to be answering here, because you're not answering 1 that I posed? I asked you what besides your personal opinion makes it a classic? Your personal opinion is all good, but who cares? I don't. Again, if you're going to say that classics are all about personal opinion then it goes both ways. If you can say that LT is a classic because you and other Nas fans feel like it is, then non Nas fans can deny that Illmatic is a classic if they don't personally like it. What would you say to someone who denied that Illmatic is a classic?
For the record, MC Hammer's "Please Hammer, Don't Hurt Em" and Vanilla Ice's "To the Extreme" are NOT classics just because they were commercially popular.Except the definition that I gave for classic is based partly on popularity and success amongst the hiphop crowd/masses, not the pop masses. Those albums were never acclaimed by the hiphop audience, they were strictly commercial hits.
Looks like nicca's are suffering from confused admiration, Nas needs you please "Staaaaaaay"looks like the Gnauz stans have made their way here from sohh
looks like the Gnauz stans have made their way here from sohh
What I do know is that there is a difference between personal favorites and classics. Im not all over the place and the definition that I have for classic albums is perfectly coherent. Classic albums are simply defined as albums that stand out, mark a period of time, and have made an impact on the game according to the hiphop masses. Thats a pretty objective standard. We can debate whether specific albums meet that standard, but the standard itself is objective. What you're saying is that there are no classics, only personal favorites.
What question are you supposed to be answering here, because you're not answering 1 that I posed? I asked you what besides your personal opinion makes it a classic? Your personal opinion is all good, but who cares? I don't. Again, if you're going to say that classics are all about personal opinion then it goes both ways. If you can say that LT is a classic because you and other Nas fans feel like it is, then non Nas fans can deny that Illmatic is a classic if they don't personally like it. What would you say to someone who denied that Illmatic is a classic?
Except the definition that I gave for classic is based partly on popularity and success amongst the hiphop crowd/masses, not the pop masses. Those albums were never acclaimed by the hiphop audience, they were strictly commercial hits.