So basically Kamalas campaign lied to the country

[Formerly Black Trash]

Are you playing dumb? A campaign needs to maintain public optimism, even when internal polling shows challenges. They are called internal polls for a reason. You want to do everything to avoid demoralizing your base. And that's not tantamount to lying. There are better avenues for criticism of her campaign.

You didn't answer my question

IS Kamalas polling better than the other polling we were getting from other sources and if so why?

Edit: actually you know what, I remember polls saying she was neck and neck

 

[B86]

trump is in office for one reason and thats because of white supremacy. Trumps platform could have been kicking puppies and white america would have voted for it.

Did white supremacy take a break when he lost to Biden? It was on vacation?

 

[Germms]

Lying to avoid project 2025 >>>>

 

[LV Koopa]

The consequences of that would have been blacks and women angry as fukk that the VP was skipped over when the natural progression of things is for the VP to step in when the POTUS can't continue.

That is true only in the capacity of the VP to serve as the President's backup. NOT in her ability to be nominated for an election. There is no natural progression for that. Elected officials don't have inherited roles. Those are separate things.

 

[Formerly Black Trash]

Lying to avoid project 2025 >>>>

The lie didn't do that

It aided her in doubling and her sycophants saying see, we're winning...

 

[LV Koopa]

Yep.

They used these cooked up “polls” to hype up the fundraising efforts and knew damn well that she wasn’t leading where it mattered.

This chick lost EVERY single swing stated and did worst than Biden yet we were supposed to believe these media polling reports that were being spoon fed by her team.

Only winners on that side were the ones who walked off with bags from that $1 billion vault. That’s the part of the story no one is really going to hear about. If I knew they were throwing out bags like that I would’ve offered my services to her campaign.

Her campaign was like an 80s movie montage where the lead character is an underdog but has to “train” to fight the much stronger villain. Those montages were unrealistic and had you hyped that the underdog would somehow win — but that’s not how life works.

Grift goddess

 

[CM_Burns]

Kamala distancing herself from Biden wouldnt have been believable. One because she was Bidens VP, two because she was chosen for VP and backed for President by the party because she's in line with the Democratic Party policies and going to follow their agenda, like Biden did.

She couldn't throw Biden under the bus and it would've looked stupid if she tried.

 

[Bolzmark]

That is true only in the capacity of the VP to serve as the President's backup. NOT in her ability to be nominated for an election. There is no natural progression for that. Elected officials don't have inherited roles. Those are separate things.

Not OFFICIALLY no. It was an expectation. If she was good enough to be the backup if he died then she should be good enough to take over if he can't run. If you watched CNN and others that covered the Dems you saw where this was becoming a point of contention. Kind of like how so many people are mad and in their feelings about Lil Wayne not being the headliner at the Super Bowl. Is there some rule that the biggest rapper from whatever city the game is in should be the headliner? No. But people expected it.

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

You didn't answer my question

IS Kamalas polling better than the other polling we were getting from other sources and if so why?

Internal polling isn't necessarily better or worse than public polling, it's just different. Internal polling uses stricter voter models and focuses on likely voters and key demographics. Public polls use broader sampling and different turnout assumptions. Internal polls are designed to guide campaign strategy by avoiding overestimation of support, even if that means showing less than favorable results. So, while her internal polling may not be "better" in terms of outcomes, it's better for the campaign's purpose of making informed decisions (which her team seemed to ignore). The difference in focus explains the variation in results. It doesn't suggest dishonesty.

 

[Formerly Black Trash]

Internal polling isn't necessarily better or worse than public polling, it's just different. Internal polling uses stricter voter models and focuses on likely voters and key demographics. Public polls use broader sampling and different turnout assumptions. Internal polls are designed to guide campaign strategy by avoiding overestimation of support, even if that means showing less than favorable results. So, while her internal polling may not be "better" in terms of outcomes, it's better for the campaign's purpose of making informed decisions (which her team seemed to ignore). The difference in focus explains the variation in results. It doesn't suggest dishonesty.

Thx

 

[AllHolosEve]

It's a double edged sword and people have already accepted to speed up fate rather than delay the process.
Choosing Kamala would've delayed or stalled the inevitable but Trump being elected fresh outta prison was also an indication of the beginning of the end. He's a microcosm of America....

-This just shows how stupid people are, this isn't something like cancer. If this was indeed inevitable the smart thing to do would be delay it or let it happen on its own while you plan & prepare for it. You don't speed it up with no plan. These people might as well kill themselves since Death is the ultimate inevitability.

.........All them democratic consultants been doing shows all over taking no accountability for how badly they ran the campaign.....its always "the people were stupid"...The whole democratic leadership needs to change....get these losers outta here

-Dems fukking up doesn't mean people aren't also stupid.

 

[Ezekiel 25:17]

The consequences of that would have been blacks and women angry as fukk that the VP was skipped over when the natural progression of things is for the VP to step in when the POTUS can't continue.

This is a false notion. Obama and Biden had way better turnouts that Kamala.

Democrats were lazy and did the bare minimum knowing good and well Biden was deteriorating. They could've had much better candidate than Kamala.

 

[⠀X ⠀]

They need to learn from their mistakes and not repeat them in 2028 and lose to JD Vance

Nah, They’re still gonna put LGBT, abortion and having a female as president, at the forefront of their campaign, even though the voters don’t see those as the most important issues.

 

[Ezekiel 25:17]

trump is in office for one reason and thats because of white supremacy. Trumps platform could have been kicking puppies and white america would have voted for it.

Nah. Obama would've shytted all over Trump.

 

[LV Koopa]

Agree 100%. Democrats need to learn math. 2 weeks after the 2020 election Biden turned 78. How they couldn't add it up that he would be 82 before his 2nd term started and very likely to experience cognitive decline is a damm mystery to me.

2 years ago the public was saying Biden looked like he declined. Democrats said it was just a Republican talking point.
When their own voters said nah, he looks a bit weary and should not run for a 2nd term they were told to shut up. The Democratic shills on this damn website were parroting that. Said you were a nazi, cac, or Trump stan spreading misinformation.

Fast forward to Summer 2024. Biden looks washed, and now we are hearing its not Kamala's fault, her campaign didn't have enough time.

You cannot reason with people who want to drink the kool-aid willingly.