So Ancient Egyptians really looked like this?

Joined
Jul 24, 2018
Messages
6,468
Reputation
703
Daps
16,168
It's true. People don't like reading about West Africa like that. I'm personally a huge fan of our history.
Same here. However, many of these 'hoteps', 'hebrew israelites' and the rest of their deluded ilk can barely name one pre-colonial polity that existed in West Africa.

Never really got into Egypt like that.
Likewise.
 
Joined
Jul 24, 2018
Messages
6,468
Reputation
703
Daps
16,168
Plus Egyptians used Henna.

Its obvious cacs had a vested interest in destroying and rewriting history to muddy the waters of African civilisation. That is 100% fact, anything else is downright dishonest.

These are the same cacs that created biological racism to justify all their inhumanity to Africans. Anything in those times can be viewed with immense scepticism since it was the norm and anything they did was based in that root. Since then, there are centuries of specific cac anti-black racism that millions of people have been affected by.




They've only recently started to write some history, such as humanity (homo sapien) beginning in Africa, one which many racists don't believe and the discovery of the cheddar man.

2835.jpg


This is how early Britons looked like. :mjlol:


A lot of cac racists are pissed at these later historical findings.
Genotype =/= Phenotype.
It doesn't matter what he looked like. Cheddar man is very much related to other Western Europeans both ancient and modern.
 

invalid

Banned
Joined
Feb 21, 2015
Messages
19,972
Reputation
6,797
Daps
80,748
"Arabs" as we know them today did not exist during that early time in history. Then you said the the Europeans came AFTER the Arabs. You're completely false. Alexander invaded Kemet during the 4th century BC. The Arabs again did not come onto the land until after the fall of the dynasties during the 7th century AD. See;

There was NO ARABS in Egypt before this period. This is common knowledge dude....

I don't know if you call them "Arab" or not but the Hyksos, whose origins lie in the Levant, invaded, settled, and ruled Egypt during the latter part of the Middle Kingdom before the Thutmosid Family of the 18th dynasty overtook them and ushered in the New Kingdom.

Hyksos-Mural-Canaanite.jpg
 

Dave24

Superstar
Joined
Dec 11, 2015
Messages
16,653
Reputation
1,438
Daps
22,531
You didn't have to put dates. The fact that you claim that New Kingdom (as I presume is what you meant by "middle Egypt") was "Arab" is all that's needed to dismiss your statement. "Arabs" as we know them today did not exist during that early time in history. Then you said the the Europeans came AFTER the Arabs. You're completely false. Alexander invaded Kemet during the 4th century BC. The Arabs again did not come onto the land until after the fall of the dynasties during the 7th century AD. See;

KAPPA3030827.jpg


There was NO ARABS in Egypt before this period. This is common knowledge dude....



You use you ignorance to promote dumb white racist rhetoric. Stop it!!!

What did alexander and the other macedonians look like back then?
 

Asante

All Star
Joined
Apr 3, 2014
Messages
1,867
Reputation
90
Daps
5,392
45WW0wy.gif


I have respect for Ancient Egypt but let's be honest, they were pretty much cucks since the 22nd dynasty (Berbers).

Kemet's importance was pointed out by the African scholar known as C.A. Diop. It and Nubia (one continuous civilization in all truth) were the centerpiece of ancient African civilization, and it's influence clearly diffused into what would later be called Sub Saharan Africa. Kemet the resulted from the unity of our people whom are now scattered throughout the continent.

I'd rather talk about the Bantu expansions/migrations that started 3000-4000 years ago starting around SE Nigeria & Western Cameroon.

You and I both know that that is Cac bullshyt, that was designed to mislead Africans (particularly Niger-Congo speaking West, Central and Southern Africans) from claiming our heritage in ancient Kemet and Nubia. At least two genetic studies in the last year have debunked this Cameroonian origin of the Bantu Cac theory.

83168652_2858944320822826_1598551063378526208_o.jpg

Check the one below that was sensationalized for finding "Ghost populations" in West Africa. The sample dates in the study from Cameroon spanned 5 thousand years, from 6,000 to as recently as 1,000 BC!!!! The study found no genetic evidence of the existence of Bantu's (E-M2) in the supposed Bantu homeland of Cameroon;

Ancient West African foragers in the context of African population history
Mark Lipson, Isabelle Ribot, […]David Reich


Nature (2020)

Our knowledge of ancient human population structure in sub-Saharan Africa, particularly prior to the advent of food production, remains limited. Here we report genome-wide DNA data from four children—two of whom were buried approximately 8,000 years ago and two 3,000 years ago—from Shum Laka (Cameroon), one of the earliest known archaeological sites....However, the genome-wide ancestry profiles of all four individuals are most similar to those of present-day hunter-gatherers from western Central Africa, which implies that populations in western Cameroon today—as well as speakers of Bantu languages from across the continent—are not descended substantially from the population represented by these four people


The study found that the people in Cameroon were the Twa or "Pygmies", which is the same thing that the African scholar C.A. Diop stated 50 years ago.

jrqln4_zpsjc0tdfoz.png

They were probably the first Iron age peoples and they spread agriculture across Central, East and Southern Africa. I wonder what artefacts we could uncover through archeological research? What polities are there to be found that they created during the Bantu's spread?

Completely bogus bullshyt.
 
Last edited:
Top