ThaRealness
Superstar
Its a cold world outchea. Especially for a$$holes who attract shallow, likeminded people
Its a cold world outchea. Especially for a$$holes who attract shallow, likeminded people
this old nikka living in the 1950sonce again, how are you leading the house hold that she's running? if you're making 40k a yr and she's making 130k, you're just a leader in title only.
i dont expect black men to find a problem with woman leading the relationship and household. i just want to know how you weak fukks are going to challenge the structure of white supremacy when you're being dominating in your own home by women.
men think it's juvenile to worry about making more money until your deep into a relationship and your lady pulls out her dikk. better yet, when she sees all her non-black female co-workers being taken care of by men making twice as much as they do; and you're basically a liability that can be cut at anytime.
but yeah, keep believing women are going to honestly respect you while earning more. seems like everyone, including black women, understand true power comes from the money. nikkas cant see past their dikk at all, so miss me with all that "im still the man, i lay the pipe down on my girl " bullshyt
this old nikka living in the 1950s
You want a neg?
He's not wrong. To most people, money = power.
biggest gem in the thread and it'll go over all these nikkas heads
Justify yourselves through the white man's currency brehs.
Is there a black man's currency that will justify black men?
The reality is, men, from time immemorial, have ALWAYS been measured by what they accomplish....what they produce. Whether that be captured animals for food and fur, goods they bartered for or money they made. In our current society, money is the symbol of said production. But even if it wasn't, there would be another form of "currency", whether paper money or something else, that would be used as the modus operandi for exchange of products/services, which the acquisition of, in part, would be used to measure the capability of men.
Not to get in the middle of the back and forth, but your statement seems short sighted. I mean, currency is not a white thing...its a human thing. People trade one thing for another and will continue this until the sun burns the Earth into dust. So, if the currency was duck feathers and white people were still the ones controlling the earth's resources and access to those resources, would we be accused of "justifying ourselves through the white man's currency" still?
Further clarification would be appreciated.
Peace
she eats the big piece of chicken and leaves you the wing. no sides. no biscuit.
So what did nikkas do before there was currencyJust a quick input. Men still hold the title of being the breadwinner and if youre being outdone in your own household then that somewhat makes you less of a man in the household. Let's not be totally oblivious to that dynamic, friends.
No offense, but I'm really not interested in debating this topic further. If people have a problem with their woman making more than them, fine whatever. That's on them. I however couldn't care less. It is what it is.