You keep avoiding the overall point in preventing the situation from happening in the first place. It's an easy solution that solves the problem on the men's side.
The same applies to women
They don’t HAVE TO let dudes nut in them
You keep avoiding the overall point in preventing the situation from happening in the first place. It's an easy solution that solves the problem on the men's side.
Correctly and it’s amazingly easy to avoid putting yourself in a disadvantaged situation but yet we have to go round and round about it.Its abundantly clear both parties arent equal in pregnancy under the laws of the land
If a woman insists on not using a condom under the condition that the man doesnt cum in her then he should be able to be charged with sexual assault if he does
If a woman pokes a hole in a condom and gets pregnant then she should be able to get charged with sexual assault as well
Its abundantly clear both parties arent equal in pregnancy under the laws of the land
The same applies to women
This isn’t true. Once paternity is established both parents have the same exact rights in every state.In my state if you're not married at the time of birth you have absolutely NO rights as a father (Florida)
That same state would put you on child support though at the behest of the women... interesting how that works
Men and women have equal rights to the child after it’s born.
Yes. This about ideological control.I agree that it’s far more sinister, but if the only people getting abortions were women who were raped/molested or had health issues that weren’t self inflicted, 90 percent of abortions would disappear
You still think they would have been pushing for this if that was the case? I’m not saying that they wouldn’t have wanted to.
If men are creating babies and a woman chooses to not have it then make the men pay for the abortion as restitution
If both parties are equal in a pregnancy and a man does not want the baby to be born and the woman does then what?
How many women get pregnant to trap the man and get child support to essentially be able to retire and never work again?
Any time its, "wiped clean" it's wiped clean for both parties.A woman could give her kid up for adoption and slate wiped clean. A woman can terminate the pregnancy and slate wiped clean. Bottom line is women have a way out. Men don’t.
Same for financial support as wellFor custody not for financial support
Petition to establish paternity....its an actual court motion you'd have to fileThis isn’t true. Once paternity is established both parents have the same exact rights in every state.
This is a good question, and one that people don’t want to address. Sex comes with a lot of responsibilities and the “it’s her body her choice” excuse that a lot of men make is BS and a cop out.Up until the day before yesterday, if a woman decided (for whatever reason) that she wasn’t ready to bring a child into the world, then she was allowed to hit the restart button.
If a man made a poor choice and got a woman pregnant, he has to pay child support for 18 years even if he lets the woman know that he’s not ready to bring a child into the world and he doesn’t want her to have the baby
Can a LOGICAL and NON EMOTIONAL person who is upset about roe v wade being overturned please explain how one is ok and the other is not? Let’s not focus on the outliers(rape/incest/medical issues) - we are trying to keep it logical.
I’m pro choice, I’m just confused why the only person with a choice AFTER the mistake has been made is the woman
You don’t have to pay child support until paternity is established.Petition to establish paternity....its an actual court motion you'd have to file
A man literally would have to go to file a petition with the court and pray the mother plays fair ball to not have to spend thousands of dollars just to enjoy the company of his own child.
While still paying child support. How is that equal ?