Family Lives Matter
#FLM
YOURE NOT GOOD AT THIS ALL.
CAC HUMOR
Retarded ass can't even form a full sentence.
YOURE NOT GOOD AT THIS ALL.
CAC HUMOR
Retarded ass can't even form a full sentence.
You know people on this site are miserable they don't like shyt
who seems more like a mal-adjusted bookworm to you?
norton played the hulk as someone who was "cursed" and that was the wrong choice. he played him as a man heroic enough to stand up for strangers. a man sure enough of himself to command an entire factory to stop working. a man confident enough to take charge in conversations. a leader.
all things which banner is not.
he needed to play someone who was conflicted and unsure of himself. a man hidingd behind sarcasm to mask bottled up rage - which is the better choice and what ruffalo did
"hiding behind" personality traits used as a defence is a personality trait of the troubled like "the comedian (watchmen)" or the "tears of a clown"
ruffalo played banner a man with serious personal issues. a figitty, hand wringing man, uncomforable with himself and his surroundings.
"i'm always angry"
"STOP lying to me"
"me in a pressurised tube.. no this is much better"
is that true? "erm ... well ... " *avoids question*
rational leader types are not prone to petulent outbursts and/or sustained rage. people without the internal balance to relate to and assert their position, views and rights in the world are. people who feel that the world is out of their control and against them.
That’s not true at all. Norton playing him as cursed was the right way to play him.
the MCU story is not of a man who is "cursed". it is of a man who has inner demons that he hides through flippancy and sarcasm.
hence why "finding himself" enabled banner to merge with hulk.
did you miss that.
You literally described iron man which is the point of my statement that Norton played the most comic accurate version of banner which is why arguing that Ruffalo was better without taking the comics which is the source material into account is flawed.
Norton’s interview where he basically described the premise of immortal hulk which was critically acclaimed and celebrated by fans demonstrates the greater understanding of banner and his place in marvel’s mythos. But if you don’t read comic books than your position is more understandable.
once again norton played him as a man "cursed".
ruffalo played him as a man with internal "personality struggles"..
the MCU narrative has shown that the hulk is a man with internal struggles.
in overcoming these "struggles" hulk/banner merged
because jen doesn't have these struggles she has no need to "merge" because she is not split. she is at peace internally.
norton focused on the wrong thing i.e. "cursed but confident" whereas ruffalo focused on the right thing i.e. "conflicted and non-confident"
it's not hard to understand.
explain why the above is wrong.
or don't @ me
WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?
THERE WAS NO MCU BEFORE
NORTONS HULK....
HOW CAN YOU SAY
THE MCU HULK WAS ABOUT THIS
WHILE NORTONS HULK WAS ABOUT THAT
AS IF THERE WAS SOME MCU SOURCE MATERIAL NORTON SHOULD HAVE BEEN FOLLOWING.
THERE WAS NO MCU NARRATIVE
BEFOREHAND AND THEYVE CLEARLY
RUINED HULKS CHARACTER.
YOURE JUST POSTING FOR
THE SAKE OF POSTING.
HE BODIED YOU.
ITS OVER.
once again norton played him as a man "cursed".
ruffalo played him as a man with internal "personality struggles"..
the MCU narrative has shown that the hulk is a man with internal struggles.
in overcoming these "struggles" hulk/banner merged
because jen doesn't have these struggles she has no need to "merge" because she is not split. she is at peace internally.
norton focused on the wrong thing i.e. "cursed but confident" whereas ruffalo focused on the right thing i.e. "conflicted and non-confident"
it's not hard to understand.
explain why the above is wrong.
or don't @ me