Sep 28 - Americans Have No Idea How Bad Inequality Really Is

Handsback

All Star
Joined
Jul 18, 2012
Messages
1,381
Reputation
430
Daps
4,879
Reppin
NULL
A better question would be how do they differ from the U.S.

The one size fits all idea is dangerous IMHO, especially when size, cultural make up, interest etc. differ greatly.

:what:How do they differ from the US? They have a more progressive tax structure. I just said that.

Most reputable economists advocate for tax reform. But hey, why listen to smart people when they speak about their field?
 

heisenburrr

Have Fun Staying Poor
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
5,775
Reputation
270
Daps
5,021
This isn't rocket science. We don't have to reinvent the wheel to combat income inequality. Take a look at who has the lowest Gini coefficients and introduce some of their policies. What do Sweden, Denmark, and Norway have in common? More progressive tax structures than we do. If we wanted to fix the problems we know how to.

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2172rank.html

What do they have in common that the USA has not?

No debts.

It is much too late for "more progressive tax structures" to solve this inequality problem.

Rich%20vs%20Poor_0.jpg
 

TLR Is Mental Poison

The Coli Is Not For You
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
46,178
Reputation
7,463
Daps
105,788
Reppin
The Opposite Of Elliott Wilson's Mohawk
Agree, but that isn't saying much. :manny:

Its outdated, racist, inefficient, and now provides next to no human capital.
Is it better than nothing? Because that would be the only option for most Americans.

This isn't rocket science. We don't have to reinvent the wheel to combat income inequality. Take a look at who has the lowest Gini coefficients and introduce some of their policies. What do Sweden, Denmark, and Norway have in common? More progressive tax structures than we do. If we wanted to fix the problems we know how to.

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2172rank.html

There's a lot mroe they have in common that's a lot more relevant to the barriers of wealth for the American middle class... any ideas as to what those might be?
Not "no govt." and yes, there are a bunch of things the market would not be best at, my point is it would be superior to the govt. option.
Where would govt options be better?
A better question would be how do they differ from the U.S.

The one size fits all idea is dangerous IMHO, especially when size, cultural make up, interest etc. differ greatly.
Your whole philosophy is one size fits all- "market solutions are always superior", even when they're not.
 

Brown_Pride

All Star
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
6,416
Reputation
785
Daps
7,887
Reppin
Atheist for Jesus
It is increasing the quality of life for people. Americans are just mad it is no longer them eating all the cake.
what is increasing the quality of life? Providing more money to CEOs? I guess sure they're able to afford a 3rd or 4th vacation house so YES technically someone's life is getting better...approximately 1% of the population is having a field day out there, everyone else is stuck in the 80's...but with better cell phones.
 

Handsback

All Star
Joined
Jul 18, 2012
Messages
1,381
Reputation
430
Daps
4,879
Reppin
NULL
What do they have in common that the USA has not?

No debts.

It is much too late for "more progressive tax structures" to solve this inequality problem.

Rich%20vs%20Poor_0.jpg

Not according to Stiglitz or Krugman or Rajan or tons of other economists.
 

Handsback

All Star
Joined
Jul 18, 2012
Messages
1,381
Reputation
430
Daps
4,879
Reppin
NULL
There's a lot mroe they have in common that's a lot more relevant to the barriers of wealth for the American middle class... any ideas as to what those might be?
.

:pachaha: You're right. We have a much different mindset than they do. That progressive tax structure comes with a progressive mindset and boy could we use some of both. It'd be nice to live in a country that actually followed through on wanting better for it's citizens. If we ever do, we know where to look.
 

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
50,913
Reputation
4,411
Daps
88,975
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
Is it better than nothing? Because that would be the only option for most Americans.

Your whole philosophy is one size fits all- "market solutions are always superior", even when they're not.
The market isn't a solution, but a system by which many solution will arise. The best one being the one adopted.
:beli:But you know that.



Is it better than nothing? Because that would be the only option for most Americans.
If there is a strong enough demand for something, the market will supply it.


A look back to when we had even less shows that schools will pop up to serve those without. This state provision is the only way narrative, doesn't hold up to any amount of scrutiny.

The success of blacks without state provision is well documented, and had it not been for the racist fueled terrorism we were subject to, who knows how far we would have gone.
 

Chris.B

Banned
Joined
Jun 22, 2012
Messages
18,922
Reputation
-4,604
Daps
21,892
:beli:
having it "good" and having it "equal" or "just" or fuk even "mildly within the realm of reason" are not the same thing.
I hate to break the news to you but we all can't be equal.
even in communist countries the leaders are living it up
 

heisenburrr

Have Fun Staying Poor
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
5,775
Reputation
270
Daps
5,021
Not according to Stiglitz or Krugman or Rajan or tons of other economists.

Please refrain from using this fraud as a support for any argument.

That said, I am not saying it couldn't do some good for some. It could relieve some pressure for those at the very bottom. But ultimately the weight will be carried by the higher class and professionals and the super wealthy will come out unscathed.
 

TLR Is Mental Poison

The Coli Is Not For You
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
46,178
Reputation
7,463
Daps
105,788
Reppin
The Opposite Of Elliott Wilson's Mohawk
The market isn't a solution, but a system by which many solution will arise. The best one being the one adopted.
:beli:But you know that.


We have a market system now. People can go to public schools or private schools.


If there is a strong enough demand for something, the market will supply it.
A look back to when we had even less shows that schools will pop up to serve those without. This state provision is the only way narrative, doesn't hold up to any amount of scrutiny.

The success of blacks without state provision is well documented, and had it not been for the racist fueled terrorism we were subject to, who knows how far we would have gone.
Who said anything about making the state provision the only way?

The existence of public schools doesn't eliminate private schools.

The existence of a public healthcare option wouldn't elminate private options.

Strawmen are the hallmark of a lack of comprehension and a glut of desperation.
 

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
50,913
Reputation
4,411
Daps
88,975
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
We have a market system now. People can go to public schools or private schools.



Who said anything about making the state provision the only way?

The existence of public schools doesn't eliminate private schools.

Remove the states authority over standards for educational accomplishment and they'd truly be from up under the thumb of the state. :sas2:


... but when you say "If govt doesnt fund it who will" it sounds(to me) like you believe govt. to be the only answer, sorry if I misunderstood.




The existence of a public healthcare option wouldn't elminate private options.

:heh: You can't possibly believe this.
 
Top