I know.
thats a pretty bold statement...
I'll correct it...
They have no morals when it comes to other people's lifestyles and the well being of their fellow countrymen.
I know.
thats a pretty bold statement...
Pos repBetter equip people in the bottom and middle to generate their own wealth, and protect them from having their wealth eroded by things like
- artificially expensive housing
- a goofy and unnecessarily expensive healthcare system
- free higher education
- more flexible/free childcare
- education and help for financial literacy and planning
Etc etc
If u asked 100 average people what kinds of things were keeping them from building wealth on a day to day basis, how many of them do u think would say 'the fact that someone else has more money than me'
If most earned more than 70k? no, if we just gave it to them, yes. IMHOWould it be the end of America if most households make more than 70K?
Well theres a lot of things wrong in this post
lol, rich people don't even care about other rich people unless it benefits them. Most aren't thinking about the poor . a guy making 600 Million as CEO isn't trying to hear shyt about going to 300 Millions so that his workers can go from $9 to $16 and maybe not struggle as much... maybe afford community college or new shoes for their kids.
And i think we should cut military spending...........What i meant by We aren't going to cut it is......... the very people we are discussing do not want it cut and they control the people who are in place to cut it........and the they control the campaign funds, media and in-turn the Votes of the people who the Military industrial complex affects the most.
what are you referring to when you say exploit? Wages?so you think it's ok that the wealthy need to exploit to remain that way?
Would it be the end of America if most households make more than 70K?
There are very few that would blow the opportunities given.If most earned more than 70k? no, if we just gave it to them, yes. IMHO
lol, you sound very aggressive.Well theres a lot of things wrong in this post
For starters CEO pay is largely tied up in stock options... i.e. its not actual money they can spend, its just paper wealth they cant really access till they retire. Secondly the highest CEO yearly pay is about 150M and again thats from exercising stock options. U are off by an order of magnitude on real CEO pay. Thirdly $16 is still struggling and that little raise doesn't address any of the problems keeping poor people poor. Healthcare only got less expensive with reform... student loans are still crazy high... u can't rent an apartment on $16/hour somewhere like SF or NYC. Fourthly u grossly overexaggerate the effect CEO pay has... if they gave up their $$$ it would range anywhere from like $100 a YEAR to $1 an hour. So like always someone talking "CEO pay" has no fukking clue what they're talking about and don't really care about actually addressing the issues poor people are facing.
And as for your second paragraph... yadda fukking yadda... if "they control the people in place" and nothing can be done why bother participating in a discussion to begin with? Just to whine and play the victim card? What a waste of time.
There isn't an endless amount of wealth or opportunity so that everyone can be the one to 'create' it.what are you referring to when you say exploit? Wages?
What kind of jobs are you speaking of?
There are also a good amount of well paying manual labor jobs that arent being filled because there arent enough qualified people to fill them.
Truth is...automation is changing everything...a lot of these low level jobs will be useless in the near future.
Its projected that 40% to 50% of the workforce will be independent contractors.
People need to adapt, and realize that depending on a job isnt going to be the way of the future...thats just how it is.
Politicians are doing a horrible job of telling the truth (on both sides).
It goes both ways.There isn't an endless amount of wealth or opportunity so that everyone can be the one to 'create' it.
We can't shyt on workers just because they take traditional paths.
People who aren't wealthy need to have jobs they can depend on and also be paid a wage that their families can ................increase the chance of making it into the middle class on.
It's crazy that the people who actually build everything and make everything are some of the most struggling............we wouldn't have shyt if it wasn't for them , yet when times change they're expected to adapt to shyt they know nothing about.
Teachers are paid less than less relevant career fields -------and they had to unionize and basically threaten to not teach in every major city to even get OK mediocre wages. That's the nation we live in.
yeah can't remember her name, but i'd be interesting hearing opinion on this topic; for research purposes
@MurderSheWrote is her name
So reform can happen, but all the shyt I listed can't?lol, you sound very aggressive.
And reform (with gov spending ) can always happen with the right circumstances and people .
How many dollars is the average CEO taking out of the average worker's pocket?As far as ceo pay..... i technically make 45K per year for a base. I'm going to leave that............. AT that, lol. SMH.
CEO pay has increase nearly 1000% in 30 years. What has worker pay increase in those same 30 years............ i'll let you do the research.
I agree, we should remove artificial barriers and restore economic mobility. How to go about this, is what we should be discussing/debating.There are very few that would blow the opportunities given.
We shouldn't give the money but we should GIVE the path.
Not make it so that very few can break into the uppper and middle class.
I agree, I just go further and think govt. shouldn't be funding any of it...Also.......... programs for urban /poor financial literacy should at least double whats given to Zionist nations. We say 'GIVEN; when we are speaking on Americans, especially black people trapped in Amerikka..............but it's OK to fund private prisons, Israel, other random nations, and random initiatives.