your a dumb muthafukka that reads about science online you probably don't even have a degree in science and your name isn't in one peer reviewed journal, probably never touched a lab.
Science eventually leads back to God
- Thread starter EBK String
- Start date
your a dumb muthafukka that reads about science online you probably don't even have a degree in science and your name isn't in one peer reviewed journal, probably never touched a lab.
That doesn't change the fact that you thought a book from a scientist was the equivalent to a scientific journal. I may read about science online but you don't even do that. You read books and think its science.your a dumb muthafukka that reads about science online you probably don't even have a degree in science and your name isn't in one peer reviewed journal, probably never touched a lab.
JuvenileHell
Veteran
Believe in God brehs 
That doesn't change the fact that you thought a book from a scientist was the equivalent to a scientific journal. I may read about science online but you don't even do that. You read books and think its science.
The book is based on actual peer reviewed science you dumb muthafukka.
Broke Wave
The GOAT
Don’t tag me with anti Islam nikkas dahell???
It's either God did it or it was the Devil
If God is in control how he let the Devil Jack his beat
You are debating theology in a thread that is based on the logical argument for God.
Again that is not science, its someones thoughts on science. Even if the person is a scientist this book is not science.The book is based on actual peer reviewed science you dumb muthafukka.
How can you not know the difference? The only way it makes that you don't know that is that you don't know the basics of science. Like whats the difference between science and a scientists thoughts on science.
Its ok, I get it, science is a boring class for a lot of people so although this is a simple straight forward concept; if you were zoning out during all of your science classes you may not know how to identify science and may think that a scientists thoughts are science.
Religious people do it all time they use science or logic in their use of a theological debateYou are debating theology in a thread that is based on the logical argument for God.
That seems like lazy thinking tbh. It's okay to not know something but to declare the answer to be god is basically giving up on looking for an answer. We probably wouldnt have half as many of our technological breakthroughs with that kind of mentality
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1086/308434
I like how you keep ignoring the peer reviewed article saying the same shyt. It just shows you are arguing in bad faith.
There can be no answer besides there being an uncreated source of the universe or the many universes that came before this. Something cannot come form nothing so at some point there has to be an untreated source of everything, whatever you want to call it.
FunkDoc1112
Heavily Armed
Religion was just a bunch of
's made by the ruling class to keep the common people in line through fear, which is obvious in how so many kingdoms and government were directly tied to the churches.History's most successful grift.
