S. Carolina officer charged w/ murder of a black man after video footage released

[the cac mamba]

And the fact that he planted the tazer and lied on the police report

yeah i dont wanna hear why dude ran

i wanna hear why the fukk that pig thought he was gonna get away with that. or fukk that; an explanation of what exactly he did there

 

[Isaiah Bradley]

Come up off of Al's nuts.

He's NOT needed.

Period.

He's a distraction and everything he has been apart of has devolved into a PR battle over the optics of each tragedy.

You are not working on an ad campagin. So all those BS chatter about being a distraction, while ignoring the other similar cases, that he was not apart of, having the same conclusion

Clowns like you are acting like your approach, removing all obvious racial elements, hasn't been used before. It has been used and ended the same way....provide a case that Rev Al was not apart of that resulted in a guilty verdict and they did not use the racial element in the case?

 

[Matt504]

Personal gain in that folks who are afraid to comment on the racial layer is trying to convey a message about themselves, not about the case

You can't have it both ways. It is either a racial layer or not. There is no chess move if you are trying to pretend that the racial layer does not exist. That approach has been used before, with the same result

EDIT: Since when does politics exist in a vacuum, where personal beliefs does not affect it. So this being politics has nothing to do with whether Rev Al is there or it is called a racial issue

let me break this down into simpler sentences.

it's being called a racial issue by Black people,

WHITE PEOPLE ARE SAYING THIS IS A BAD COP ISSUE,

WHITE PEOPLE CONSIDER AL SHARPTON TO BE A RACE HUSTLER (do yourself a favor and google the term "race hustler" and see who's name comes up first)

The Scott family asking Al Sharpton NOT to be present is also saying "WE ARE NOT TRYING TO MAKE THIS ABOUT RACE"

Race Hustler
A term coined to describe those individuals of a particular race who project themselves into the media spotlight as spokespersons whenever there is an alledged racial incident which involves their race. The use of the word "Hustler", included as a part of the term, also implies that these individuals expliot a racial situation to serve their own interests.
Recently, this term has often been used to describe the Reverends Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton as "Race Hustlers".
by Roger W. Dawson April 13, 2007

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

You are not working on an ad campagin. So all those BS chatter about being a distraction, while ignoring the other similar cases, that he was not apart of, having the same conclusion

Clowns like you are acting like your approach, removing all obvious racial elements, hasn't been used before. It has been used and ended the same way....provide a case that Rev Al was not apart of that resulted in a guilty verdict and they did not use the racial element in the case?

Do you not understand how caustic Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson's brands are? Jesse seems to have learned to fall the ENTIRE fukk back.

Sharpton is out here chanting all this shyt, but not even making any real progress outside of marching and praying. His brand took a severe hit after ferguson.

And why should I provide a case sharpton was in that gave a guilty verdict? We'll never know because there were incidents where his presence did IRREPARABLE damage to the framework of the case.

Him staying out is one fewer thing detractors have to say about this case.

 

[Isaiah Bradley]

let me break this down into simpler sentences.

it's being called a racial issue by Black people,

WHITE PEOPLE ARE SAYING THIS IS A BAD COP ISSUE,

WHITE PEOPLE CONSIDER AL SHARPTON TO BE A RACE HUSTLER (do yourself a favor and google the term "race hustler" and see who's name comes up first)

The Scott family asking Al Sharpton NOT to be present is also saying "WE ARE NOT TRYING TO MAKE THIS ABOUT RACE"

Let me break it down to you in simpler sentences
This approach has already been used. Same result
Not a chess move, just going along to get along

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

YES, WE ARE WORRIED ABOUT HOW 'THEY' SEE shyt, AND WITH GOOD REASON!

you should't have this discussion because you're being totally dishonest thinking thinking that this video is all it's gonna take to get a conviction, you're not living in reality if you're NOT worried about how 'they' see shyt, when 'they' are on the jury I bet you'll be VERY concerned about how 'they' see shyt.

Precisely.

Not understanding how "they" think leads people to a cycle of abuse and misunderstanding as to why they never get what they want.

@Eye Cue 182 & @Bittasweet doesn't understand how PR and optics work in cases like this.

Sharpton isn't even powerful at this point.

 

[Eye Cue DA COLI GAWD]

YES, WE ARE WORRIED ABOUT HOW 'THEY' SEE shyt, AND WITH GOOD REASON!

you should't have this discussion because you're being totally dishonest thinking thinking that this video is all it's gonna take to get a conviction, you're not living in reality if you're NOT worried about how 'they' see shyt, when 'they' are on the jury I bet you'll be VERY concerned about how 'they' see shyt.

You are a pawn then.

Most of the facts of what happened are on video.

The only part that is not on video is witnessed by two bystander, one who starts to record what he's seeing.

Then we have the inaccurate police report. This is what will convict this man -- his own words.

The cover up is always worse than the crime.

Spend hours on the internet trying to find reason a cop shooting a man in the back on video will get off when he planted evidence and lied in his own police report, brehs

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Let me break it down to you in simpler sentences
This approach has already been used. Same result
Not a chess move, just going along to get along

So you advocate bringing up someone with a brand in tatters and inserting him...why?

Sharpton isn't needed nor does he add anything to the discussion.

 

[Isaiah Bradley]

Do you not understand how caustic Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson's brands are? Jesse seems to have learned to fall the ENTIRE fukk back.

Sharpton is out here chanting all this shyt, but not even making any real progress outside of marching and praying. His brand took a severe hit after ferguson.

And why should I provide a case sharpton was in that gave a guilty verdict? We'll never know because there were incidents where his presence did IRREPARABLE damage to the framework of the case.

Him staying out is one fewer thing detractors have to say about this case.

Again. Thisi s simple, provide a similar case that does not have Sharpton involved, that resulted in a guilty verdict, while maintaining the racial element

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

You are a pawn then.

Most of the facts of what happened are on video.

Then you don't know how court works. Facts on video are merely observations.

Intent, motivations, and reactions are all interpretations subjected to those who filter them.

The only part that is not on video is witnessed by two bystander, one who starts to record what he's seeing.

which still doesn't address what slager may or may not have done wrong

Then we have the inaccurate police report. This is what will convict this man -- his own words.

He's not being charged for falsiflying a police report.

The cover up is always worse than the crime.

Spend hours on the internet trying to find reason a cop shooting a man in the back on video will get off when he planted evidence and lied in his own police report, brehs

You're not even focusing on what Slager was charged with but you're muddying up the waters trying to play e-lawyer...

 

[No Sleep]

You are a pawn then.

Most of the facts of what happened are on video.

The only part that is not on video is witnessed by two bystander, one who starts to record what he's seeing.

Then we have the inaccurate police report. This is what will convict this man -- his own words.

The cover up is always worse than the crime.

Spend hours on the internet trying to find reason a cop shooting a man in the back on video will get off when he planted evidence and lied in his own police report, brehs

Witness 40 word will be way more evidence in this case than that video.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Again. Thisi s simple, provide a similar case that does not have Sharpton involved, that resulted in a guilty verdict, while maintaining the racial element

No.

I don't have to.

And you don't have to ride for Al Sharpton either.

 

[Isaiah Bradley]

No.

I don't have to.

And you don't have to ride for Al Sharpton either.

So you can't prove your agument, but that won't stop you from arguing

 

[Matt504]

You are a pawn then.

Most of the facts of what happened are on video.

The only part that is not on video is witnessed by two bystander, one who starts to record what he's seeing.

Then we have the inaccurate police report. This is what will convict this man -- his own words.

The cover up is always worse than the crime.

Spend hours on the internet trying to find reason a cop shooting a man in the back on video will get off when he planted evidence and lied in his own police report, brehs

if you truly believe this is a cut and dry case and he'll be convicted based on the video alone, then we have nothing more to discuss. I actually hope you're right but I disagree that it'll be that simple.

I'm not spending hours trying to find a reason the cop should get off but the cop's attorney sure is, and I guarantee he's doing a much better job of finding those reasons than my casual observations of the circumstances.

 

[the artist known az]

We need better black leaders outside of fukking entertainers man

Who the fukk cares with Kareem Abdul Jabbar thinks? I mean REALLY.

I'll never be satisfied with asking with what musicians and athletes think.

NO ONE CARES

You must not be familiar with his track record