S. Carolina officer charged w/ murder of a black man after video footage released

[5star]

Take note everyone. The guy is dead and people keep asking why he ran as if he can tell us or it matters.

Notice the type of posts that come from the posters who ask this rhetorical question time after time throughout this thread.



How many times has this been asked so far 20-25



No shame just utterly lacking testicles.

Don't even quote that hairy curry eating slurpee making fool
How many posts is he gonna make back to back . Kid should just shoot himself already . Loneliness can kill

 

[Kobes Two Jerseys]

Two of them did time if I remember. In the federal case.

In halfway houses. fukk off already.

 

[Isaiah Bradley]

I think it's a very calculated and start move by the lawyers.

oh yeah sure cause Rev Al is the reason why many white officers get off in cases that were not known and known nationally. Stop it

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

In no circle is this just cause for lethal force. Nikka get outta here with the dumb shyt.

actually, yeah. See, fleeing and the law gets REALLY weird sometimes and yes, video helps, but to say this dude was in the clear isn't accurate either.

The cop knows this which is why he planted the stun gun and lied in the police report.

Again when I see him dropping the stun gun, I don't know if its to plant evidence or to pick up his device and bring it closer to the scene so he didn't lose it.

I don't know if the officer reported that he had the stun gun or not

The police department knows this which is why they shyt canned this guy and charged him with murder.

I think it was more with the 8 shots than the stun guny

You can press pause on the backhanded race baiting bruh

I'm black, and what are you trying to say right now?

I'm saying that the cop facing a murder charge has some really interesting "defense" arguments that aren't being considered.

Yes, the police report isn't accurate.

Yes, he shouldn't have shot the man in his back

I'm not debating that. I'm talkng about chances this guy gets off.

Also a "murder" charge is vague. Is that 1st? 2nd? 3rd?

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

They ban Rev Al from funeral? smh. that is lame

No. Its Brilliant. Al's brand is tainted and I wouldn't even want to give the media any fodder to dispute any of the facts of the case with Sharpton being remotely associated.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

oh yeah sure cause Rev Al is the reason why many white officers get off in cases that were not known and known nationally. Stop it

Actually, it is to some extent.

White media hates Sharpton. And using him doesn't help when you're relying on white juries and media to distribute information about the case without getting into focusing on what color Sharpton's tie is.

As long as they keep saying Sharptons speaks for us, Sharpton will always be a distraction.

He is of no use in this incident except to try and stoke flames and further divide an already complicated issue. No matter how pure his intentions.

 

[Matt504]

oh yeah sure cause Rev Al is the reason why many white officers get off in cases that were not known and known nationally. Stop it

That's not what I'm suggesting, but White America by and large views Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson and race hustlers, having them involved would add an additional perceived racial layer.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

In halfway houses. fukk off already.

Stacey Koon and Lawrence Powell did 30 months

 

[King Poetic]

Lank?

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

We need better black leaders outside of fukking entertainers man

Who the fukk cares with Kareem Abdul Jabbar thinks? I mean REALLY.

I'll never be satisfied with asking with what musicians and athletes think.

NO ONE CARES

 

[Eye Cue DA COLI GAWD]

actually, yeah. See, fleeing and the law gets REALLY weird sometimes and yes, video helps, but to say this dude was in the clear isn't accurate either.

Again when I see him dropping the stun gun, I don't know if its to plant evidence or to pick up his device and bring it closer to the scene so he didn't lose it.

I don't know if the officer reported that he had the stun gun or not

I think it was more with the 8 shots than the stun guny

I'm black, and what are you trying to say right now?

I'm saying that the cop facing a murder charge has some really interesting "defense" arguments that aren't being considered.

Yes, the police report isn't accurate.

Yes, he shouldn't have shot the man in his back

I'm not debating that. I'm talkng about chances this guy gets off.

Also a "murder" charge is vague. Is that 1st? 2nd? 3rd?

Fleeing does not make the law "really weird" in this case. There was no voilent crime.

You understand the cop used deadly force for a unarmed guy running during a traffic stop for a broke tailight?

You getting that? What are you even arguing? You are the doing the definition of 'baiting'.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Fleeing does not make the law "really weird" in this case. There was no voilent crime.

You understand the cop used deadly force for a unarmed guy running during a traffic stop for a broke tailight?

You getting that? What are you even arguing? You are the doing the definition of 'baiting'.

If you're a cop pulling someone over for a taillight, what are you thinking (with your cop experience) when that dude randomly jumps out and starts running?

Now. Should the cop have shot the man? No.

But you are not even being REMOTELY sensible when looking at the situation from how it escalated up until the point where the man started running.

Walter Scott was fleeing and attempting to arrest those who flee gives police more lee-way than you think.

 

[Isaiah Bradley]

No. Its Brilliant. Al's brand is tainted and I wouldn't even want to give the media any fodder to dispute any of the facts of the case with Sharpton being remotely associated.

smh. Nikka talking like he is in a marketing meeting looking for a new face of the company. Save your poor attempts at distraction and confusion

Actually, it is to some extent.

White media hates Sharpton. And using him doesn't help when you're relying on white juries and media to distribute information about the case without getting into focusing on what color Sharpton's tie is.

As long as they keep saying Sharptons speaks for us, Sharpton will always be a distraction.

He is of no use in this incident except to try and stoke flames and further divide an already complicated issue. No matter how pure his intentions.

lol starting with "actually" and ending with "some extent" clearly shows your attempt at trying to force an argument that otherwise holds no ground in countering my point, which was very clear
Again, cases known and not known nationally all concluded similarly, so Rev Al's presence and their opinion about him don't mean shyt. Save the deflection attempt

 

[Isaiah Bradley]

That's not what I'm suggesting, but White America by and large views Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson and race hustlers, having them involved would add an additional perceived racial layer.

"perceived"? There is a racial layer that exist
Fear to comment on it has nothing to do with Rev Al or white folks' response. It is a personal decision, for personal gain

 

[Eye Cue DA COLI GAWD]

If you're a cop pulling someone over for a taillight, what are you thinking (with your cop experience) when that dude randomly jumps out and starts running?

Now. Should the cop have shot the man? No.

But you are not even being REMOTELY sensible when looking at the situation from how it escalated up until the point where the man started running.

Walter Scott was fleeing and attempting to arrest those who flee gives police more lee-way than you think.

Leeway does not = shooting him in the back

You keep admitting this so why are you even probing for cracks to not believe what you see with your own eyes?

Dude, just stop. You are embarrassing yourself.